% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Overhoff:895031,
      author       = {Overhoff, Helen and Ko, Yiu Hong and Feuerriegel, Daniel
                      and Fink, Gereon Rudolf and Stahl, Jutta and Weiss, Peter H.
                      and Bode, Stefan and Niessen, Eva},
      title        = {{N}eural correlates of metacognition across the adult
                      lifespan},
      journal      = {Neurobiology of aging},
      volume       = {108},
      issn         = {0197-4580},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2021-03539},
      pages        = {34 - 46},
      year         = {2021},
      abstract     = {Metacognitive accuracy describes the degree of overlap
                      between the subjective perception of one's decision accuracy
                      (i.e. confidence) and objectively observed performance. With
                      older age, the need for accurate metacognitive evaluation
                      increases; however, error detection rates typically
                      decrease. We investigated the effect of ageing on
                      metacognitive accuracy using event-related potentials (ERPs)
                      reflecting error detection and confidence: the error/correct
                      negativity (Ne/c) and the error/correct positivity (Pe/c).
                      Sixty-five healthy adults (20 to 76 years) completed a
                      complex Flanker task and provided confidence ratings. We
                      found that metacognitive accuracy declined with age beyond
                      the expected decline in task performance, while the adaptive
                      adjustment of behaviour was well preserved. Pe amplitudes
                      following errors varied by confidence rating, but they did
                      not mirror the reduction in metacognitive accuracy. Ne
                      amplitudes decreased with age for low confidence errors. The
                      results suggest that age-related difficulties in
                      metacognitive evaluation could be related to an impaired
                      integration of decision accuracy and confidence information
                      processing. Ultimately, training the metacognitive
                      evaluation of fundamental decisions in older adults might
                      constitute a promising endeavour.},
      cin          = {INM-3},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
      pnm          = {5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability
                      (POF4-525)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:34487950},
      UT           = {WOS:000709436000004},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2021.08.001},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/895031},
}