001     896732
005     20220930130326.0
024 7 _ |a 10.2196/26608
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1438-8871
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1439-4456
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/28672
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a altmetric:113383384
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a pmid:34515645
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000695742000004
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2021-03559
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Sahandi Far, Mehran
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)177922
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Exploring Test-Retest Reliability and Longitudinal Stability of Digital Biomarkers for Parkinson Disease in the m-Power Data Set: Cohort Study
260 _ _ |a Richmond, Va.
|c 2021
|b Healthcare World
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1636355362_20914
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Background: Digital biomarkers (DB), as captured using sensors embedded in modern smart devices, are a promising technology for home-based sign and symptom monitoring in Parkinson disease (PD).Objective: Despite extensive application in recent studies, test-retest reliability and longitudinal stability of DB have not been well addressed in this context. We utilized the large-scale m-Power data set to establish the test-retest reliability and longitudinal stability of gait, balance, voice, and tapping tasks in an unsupervised and self-administered daily life setting in patients with PD and healthy controls (HC).Methods: Intraclass correlation coefficients were computed to estimate the test-retest reliability of features that also differentiate between patients with PD and healthy volunteers. In addition, we tested for longitudinal stability of DB measures in PD and HC, as well as for their sensitivity to PD medication effects.Results: Among the features differing between PD and HC, only a few tapping and voice features had good to excellent test-retest reliabilities and medium to large effect sizes. All other features performed poorly in this respect. Only a few features were sensitive to medication effects. The longitudinal analyses revealed significant alterations over time across a variety of features and in particular for the tapping task.Conclusions: These results indicate the need for further development of more standardized, sensitive, and reliable DB for application in self-administered remote studies in patients with PD. Motivational, learning, and other confounders may cause variations in performance that need to be considered in DB longitudinal applications.
536 _ _ |a 5252 - Brain Dysfunction and Plasticity (POF4-525)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252
|c POF4-525
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Eickhoff, Simon B
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131678
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Goni, Maria
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)177908
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Dukart, Juergen
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)177727
|b 3
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |a 10.2196/26608
|g Vol. 23, no. 9, p. e26608 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2028830-X
|n 9
|p e26608 -
|t Journal of medical internet research
|v 23
|y 2021
|x 1438-8871
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/896732/files/Invoice_JMIR-26608-APF-0035714.pdf
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/896732/files/M-Power_JMIR_v12_JD_allAccepted.pdf
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/896732/files/PDF_Exploring.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:896732
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)177922
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131678
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)177908
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)177727
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2021
915 _ _ |a Submission fee
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0562
|2 StatID
|d 2021-01-29
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2021-01-29
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2021-01-29
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2021-01-29
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b J MED INTERNET RES : 2019
|d 2021-01-29
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2021-01-29
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2021-01-29
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
|d 2021-01-29
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2021-01-29
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2021-01-29
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Peer review
|d 2021-01-29
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2021-01-29
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b J MED INTERNET RES : 2019
|d 2021-01-29
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2021-01-29
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320
|2 StatID
|b PubMed Central
|d 2021-01-29
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2021-01-29
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
|k INM-7
|l Gehirn & Verhalten
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
980 _ _ |a APC
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 1 _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21