000897093 001__ 897093
000897093 005__ 20210928140815.0
000897093 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/28701
000897093 037__ $$aFZJ-2021-03592
000897093 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)186037$$aTyralla, Sandra$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000897093 245__ $$aInfluence of experimental design on the interference and facilitation effect of the Stroop task: a meta-regression analysis$$f2020-11-01 - 2021-09-17
000897093 260__ $$c2021
000897093 300__ $$a120
000897093 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Supervised Student Publication
000897093 3367_ $$02$$2EndNote$$aThesis
000897093 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aMASTERSTHESIS
000897093 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$amasterThesis
000897093 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)19$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aMaster Thesis$$bmaster$$mmaster$$s1632752716_29660
000897093 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aSUPERVISED_STUDENT_PUBLICATION
000897093 502__ $$aMasterarbeit, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, 2021$$bMasterarbeit$$cHeinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf$$d2021
000897093 520__ $$aThe Stroop task is used to measure cognitive interfering processes and attention control. The most common type of Stroop is the color-word Stroop task where participants have to react to the ink color and ignore the word meaning. Slower reaction times for the incongruent condition compared to the congruent or the neutral one can be found (interference effect), as well as faster reaction times for the congruent condition compared to the neutral one (facilitation effect). There are several other characteristics, which might influence these two effects. However, inconsistent results are discussed in the literature concerning comparisons between different characteristics and their influence on the interference and facilitation effect. Additionally, for some characteristics, no comparisons and influences were investigated at all. In this study, we used the robust variance estimation method to conduct meta-regression analyses over the behavioral reaction times. We included 80 studies, which contributed 118 effect sizes for the interference and 25 effect sizes for the facilitation effect. We investigated whether five different moderators have an influence on the interference or facilitation effect. Only the moderator level emotional Type of Stroop showed a significant influence only on the interference effect, resulting in a smaller interference effect when the emotional type of Stroop is used. Missing data, imprecise effect size measurements and a selective study sample might be reasons for inaccurate estimations of the underlying true effect size and, therefore, insignificant results concerning the moderator influence.
000897093 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253$$a5253 - Neuroimaging (POF4-525)$$cPOF4-525$$fPOF IV$$x0
000897093 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/897093/files/2531519_ms_psy_AbschlArbeit_vemue002_bellebau_satyr100_20210917_0739.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000897093 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:897093$$popenaire$$popen_access$$pVDB$$pdriver$$pdnbdelivery
000897093 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)186037$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000897093 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lNatural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing$$vDecoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction$$x0
000897093 9141_ $$y2021
000897093 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000897093 920__ $$lyes
000897093 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406$$kINM-7$$lGehirn & Verhalten$$x0
000897093 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000897093 980__ $$amaster
000897093 980__ $$aVDB
000897093 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000897093 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406