% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@MASTERSTHESIS{Tyralla:897093,
      author       = {Tyralla, Sandra},
      title        = {{I}nfluence of experimental design on the interference and
                      facilitation effect of the {S}troop task: a meta-regression
                      analysis},
      school       = {Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf},
      type         = {Masterarbeit},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2021-03592},
      pages        = {120},
      year         = {2021},
      note         = {Masterarbeit, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, 2021},
      abstract     = {The Stroop task is used to measure cognitive interfering
                      processes and attention control. The most common type of
                      Stroop is the color-word Stroop task where participants have
                      to react to the ink color and ignore the word meaning.
                      Slower reaction times for the incongruent condition compared
                      to the congruent or the neutral one can be found
                      (interference effect), as well as faster reaction times for
                      the congruent condition compared to the neutral one
                      (facilitation effect). There are several other
                      characteristics, which might influence these two effects.
                      However, inconsistent results are discussed in the
                      literature concerning comparisons between different
                      characteristics and their influence on the interference and
                      facilitation effect. Additionally, for some characteristics,
                      no comparisons and influences were investigated at all. In
                      this study, we used the robust variance estimation method to
                      conduct meta-regression analyses over the behavioral
                      reaction times. We included 80 studies, which contributed
                      118 effect sizes for the interference and 25 effect sizes
                      for the facilitation effect. We investigated whether five
                      different moderators have an influence on the interference
                      or facilitation effect. Only the moderator level emotional
                      Type of Stroop showed a significant influence only on the
                      interference effect, resulting in a smaller interference
                      effect when the emotional type of Stroop is used. Missing
                      data, imprecise effect size measurements and a selective
                      study sample might be reasons for inaccurate estimations of
                      the underlying true effect size and, therefore,
                      insignificant results concerning the moderator influence.},
      cin          = {INM-7},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
      pnm          = {5253 - Neuroimaging (POF4-525)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)19},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/897093},
}