Hauptseite > Publikationsdatenbank > Influence of experimental design on the interference and facilitation effect of the Stroop task: a meta-regression analysis > print

001     897093
005     20210928140815.0
024 7 _ |a 2128/28701
|2 Handle
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2021-03592
100 1 _ |a Tyralla, Sandra
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)186037
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Influence of experimental design on the interference and facilitation effect of the Stroop task: a meta-regression analysis
|f 2020-11-01 - 2021-09-17
260 _ _ |c 2021
300 _ _ |a 120
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Supervised Student Publication
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Thesis
|0 2
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a MASTERSTHESIS
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a masterThesis
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Master Thesis
|b master
|m master
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)19
|s 1632752716_29660
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a SUPERVISED_STUDENT_PUBLICATION
|2 ORCID
502 _ _ |a Masterarbeit, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, 2021
|c Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf
|b Masterarbeit
|d 2021
520 _ _ |a The Stroop task is used to measure cognitive interfering processes and attention control. The most common type of Stroop is the color-word Stroop task where participants have to react to the ink color and ignore the word meaning. Slower reaction times for the incongruent condition compared to the congruent or the neutral one can be found (interference effect), as well as faster reaction times for the congruent condition compared to the neutral one (facilitation effect). There are several other characteristics, which might influence these two effects. However, inconsistent results are discussed in the literature concerning comparisons between different characteristics and their influence on the interference and facilitation effect. Additionally, for some characteristics, no comparisons and influences were investigated at all. In this study, we used the robust variance estimation method to conduct meta-regression analyses over the behavioral reaction times. We included 80 studies, which contributed 118 effect sizes for the interference and 25 effect sizes for the facilitation effect. We investigated whether five different moderators have an influence on the interference or facilitation effect. Only the moderator level emotional Type of Stroop showed a significant influence only on the interference effect, resulting in a smaller interference effect when the emotional type of Stroop is used. Missing data, imprecise effect size measurements and a selective study sample might be reasons for inaccurate estimations of the underlying true effect size and, therefore, insignificant results concerning the moderator influence.
536 _ _ |a 5253 - Neuroimaging (POF4-525)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253
|c POF4-525
|f POF IV
|x 0
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/897093/files/2531519_ms_psy_AbschlArbeit_vemue002_bellebau_satyr100_20210917_0739.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:897093
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)186037
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2021
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
|k INM-7
|l Gehirn & Verhalten
|x 0
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a master
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21