000897406 001__ 897406
000897406 005__ 20240711113900.0
000897406 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.nme.2020.100897
000897406 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/28736
000897406 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000628782500029
000897406 037__ $$aFZJ-2021-03772
000897406 082__ $$a624
000897406 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMaviglia, F.$$b0
000897406 245__ $$aImpact of plasma-wall interaction and exhaust on the EU-DEMO design
000897406 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier$$c2021
000897406 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000897406 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000897406 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1633444626_25756
000897406 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000897406 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000897406 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000897406 520__ $$aIn the present work, the role of plasma facing components protection in driving the EU-DEMO design will be reviewed, focusing on steady-state and, especially, on transients. This work encompasses both the first wall (FW) as well as the divertor. In fact, while the ITER divertor heat removal technology has been adopted, the ITER FW concept has been shown in the past years to be inadequate for EU-DEMO. This is due to the higher foreseen irradiation damage level, which requires structural materials (like Eurofer) able to withstand more than 5 dpa of neutron damage. This solution, however, limits the tolerable steady-state heat flux to ~1 MW/m2, i.e. a factor 3–4 below the ITER specifications. For this reason, poloidally and toroidally discontinuous protection limiters are implemented in EU-DEMO. Their role consists in reducing the heat load on the FW due to charged particles, during steady state and, more importantly, during planned and off-normal plasma transients. Concerning the divertor configuration, EU-DEMO currently assumes an ITER-like, lower single null (LSN) divertor, with seeded impurities for the dissipation of the power. However, this concept has been shown by numerous simulations in the past years to be marginal during steady-state (where a detached divertor is necessary to maintain the heat flux below the technological limit and to avoid excessive erosion) and unable to withstand some relevant transients, such as large ELMs and accidental loss of detachment. Various concepts, deviating from the ITER design, are currently under investigation to mitigate such risks, for example in-vessel coils for strike point sweeping in case of reattachment, as well as alternative divertor configurations. Finally, a broader discussion on the impact of divertor protection on the overall machine design is presented.
000897406 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-134$$a134 - Plasma-Wand-Wechselwirkung (POF4-134)$$cPOF4-134$$fPOF IV$$x0
000897406 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
000897406 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSiccinio, M.$$b1$$eCorresponding author
000897406 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)156326$$aBachmann, C.$$b2
000897406 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129967$$aBiel, W.$$b3
000897406 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aCavedon, M.$$b4
000897406 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aFable, E.$$b5
000897406 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aFederici, G.$$b6
000897406 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aFirdaouss, M.$$b7
000897406 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aGerardin, J.$$b8
000897406 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHauer, V.$$b9
000897406 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aIvanova-Stanik, I.$$b10
000897406 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aJanky, F.$$b11
000897406 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKembleton, R.$$b12
000897406 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMilitello, F.$$b13
000897406 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSubba, F.$$b14
000897406 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aVaroutis, S.$$b15
000897406 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aVorpahl, C.$$b16
000897406 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2808888-8$$a10.1016/j.nme.2020.100897$$gVol. 26, p. 100897 -$$p100897 -$$tNuclear materials and energy$$v26$$x2352-1791$$y2021
000897406 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/897406/files/1-s2.0-S2352179120301587-main.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000897406 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:897406$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000897406 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)156326$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000897406 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129967$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
000897406 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-134$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-130$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bForschungsbereich Energie$$lFusion$$vPlasma-Wand-Wechselwirkung$$x0
000897406 9141_ $$y2021
000897406 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2020-09-02
000897406 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology$$d2020-09-02
000897406 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000897406 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2020-09-02
000897406 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2020-09-02
000897406 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2020-09-02
000897406 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0700$$2StatID$$aFees$$d2020-09-02
000897406 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2020-09-02
000897406 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000897406 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Peer review$$d2020-09-02
000897406 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0561$$2StatID$$aArticle Processing Charges$$d2020-09-02
000897406 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2020-09-02
000897406 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2020-09-02
000897406 920__ $$lyes
000897406 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-4-20101013$$kIEK-4$$lPlasmaphysik$$x0
000897406 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000897406 980__ $$ajournal
000897406 980__ $$aVDB
000897406 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000897406 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-4-20101013
000897406 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IFN-1-20101013