Home > Publications database > Impact of plasma-wall interaction and exhaust on the EU-DEMO design > print

001     897406
005     20240711113900.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.nme.2020.100897
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2128/28736
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000628782500029
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2021-03772
082 _ _ |a 624
100 1 _ |a Maviglia, F.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Impact of plasma-wall interaction and exhaust on the EU-DEMO design
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|c 2021
|b Elsevier
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1633444626_25756
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a In the present work, the role of plasma facing components protection in driving the EU-DEMO design will be reviewed, focusing on steady-state and, especially, on transients. This work encompasses both the first wall (FW) as well as the divertor. In fact, while the ITER divertor heat removal technology has been adopted, the ITER FW concept has been shown in the past years to be inadequate for EU-DEMO. This is due to the higher foreseen irradiation damage level, which requires structural materials (like Eurofer) able to withstand more than 5 dpa of neutron damage. This solution, however, limits the tolerable steady-state heat flux to ~1 MW/m2, i.e. a factor 3–4 below the ITER specifications. For this reason, poloidally and toroidally discontinuous protection limiters are implemented in EU-DEMO. Their role consists in reducing the heat load on the FW due to charged particles, during steady state and, more importantly, during planned and off-normal plasma transients. Concerning the divertor configuration, EU-DEMO currently assumes an ITER-like, lower single null (LSN) divertor, with seeded impurities for the dissipation of the power. However, this concept has been shown by numerous simulations in the past years to be marginal during steady-state (where a detached divertor is necessary to maintain the heat flux below the technological limit and to avoid excessive erosion) and unable to withstand some relevant transients, such as large ELMs and accidental loss of detachment. Various concepts, deviating from the ITER design, are currently under investigation to mitigate such risks, for example in-vessel coils for strike point sweeping in case of reattachment, as well as alternative divertor configurations. Finally, a broader discussion on the impact of divertor protection on the overall machine design is presented.
536 _ _ |a 134 - Plasma-Wand-Wechselwirkung (POF4-134)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-134
|c POF4-134
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Siccinio, M.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
|e Corresponding author
700 1 _ |a Bachmann, C.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)156326
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Biel, W.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129967
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Cavedon, M.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Fable, E.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Federici, G.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Firdaouss, M.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Gerardin, J.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Hauer, V.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Ivanova-Stanik, I.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 10
700 1 _ |a Janky, F.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 11
700 1 _ |a Kembleton, R.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 12
700 1 _ |a Militello, F.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 13
700 1 _ |a Subba, F.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 14
700 1 _ |a Varoutis, S.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 15
700 1 _ |a Vorpahl, C.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 16
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.nme.2020.100897
|g Vol. 26, p. 100897 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2808888-8
|p 100897 -
|t Nuclear materials and energy
|v 26
|y 2021
|x 2352-1791
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/897406/files/1-s2.0-S2352179120301587-main.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:897406
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)156326
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129967
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Energie
|l Fusion
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-130
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-134
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Plasma-Wand-Wechselwirkung
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2021
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2020-09-02
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1160
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
|d 2020-09-02
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2020-09-02
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2020-09-02
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2020-09-02
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2020-09-02
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2020-09-02
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Peer review
|d 2020-09-02
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2020-09-02
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2020-09-02
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2020-09-02
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-4-20101013
|k IEK-4
|l Plasmaphysik
|x 0
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-4-20101013
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IFN-1-20101013

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21