% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{SchnbrodtStitt:897477,
author = {Schönbrodt-Stitt, Sarah and Ahmadian, Nima and Conrad,
Christopher and Kurtenbach, Markus and Romano, Nunzio and
Bogena, Heye and Vereecken, Harry and Nasta, Paolo},
title = {{S}tatistical {E}xploration of {SENTINEL}-1 {D}ata,
{T}errain {P}arameters, and in-situ {D}ata for {E}stimating
the {N}ear-{S}urface {S}oil {M}oisture in a {M}editerranean
{A}groecosystem},
journal = {Frontiers in water},
volume = {3},
issn = {2624-9375},
address = {Lausanne},
publisher = {Frontiers Media},
reportid = {FZJ-2021-03810},
pages = {655837},
year = {2021},
abstract = {Reliable near-surface soil moisture (θ) information is
crucial for supporting risk assessment of future water
usage, particularly considering the vulnerability of
agroforestry systems of Mediterranean environments to
climate change. We propose a simple empirical model by
integrating dual-polarimetric Sentinel-1 (S1) Synthetic
Aperture Radar (SAR) C-band single-look complex data and
topographic information together with in-situ measurements
of θ into a random forest (RF) regression approach (10-fold
cross-validation). Firstly, we compare two RF models'
estimation performances using either 43 SAR parameters
(θNovSAR) or the combination of 43 SAR and 10 terrain
parameters (θNovSAR+Terrain). Secondly, we analyze the
essential parameters in estimating and mapping θ for S1
overpasses twice a day (at 5 a.m. and 5 p.m.) in a high
spatiotemporal (17 × 17 m; 6 days) resolution. The
developed site-specific calibration-dependent model was
tested for a short period in November 2018 in a field-scale
agroforestry environment belonging to the “Alento”
hydrological observatory in southern Italy. Our results show
that the combined SAR + terrain model slightly outperforms
the SAR-based model (θNovSAR+Terrain with 0.025 and 0.020
m3 m−3, and $89\%$ compared to θNovSAR with 0.028 and
0.022 m3 m−3, and $86\%$ in terms of RMSE, MAE, and R2).
The higher explanatory power for θNovSAR+Terrain is
assessed with time-variant SAR phase information-dependent
elements of the C2 covariance and Kennaugh matrix (i.e., K1,
K6, and K1S) and with local (e.g., altitude above channel
network) and compound topographic attributes (e.g., wetness
index). Our proposed methodological approach constitutes a
simple empirical model aiming at estimating θ for rapid
surveys with high accuracy. It emphasizes potentials for
further improvement (e.g., higher spatiotemporal coverage of
ground-truthing) by identifying differences of SAR
measurements between S1 overpasses in the morning and
afternoon.},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {333.7},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact
(POF4-217)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000678440700001},
doi = {10.3389/frwa.2021.655837},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/897477},
}