% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Pisek:901828,
author = {Pisek, Jan and Erb, Angela and Korhonen, Lauri and
Biermann, Tobias and Carrara, Arnaud and Cremonese, Edoardo
and Cuntz, Matthias and Fares, Silvano and Gerosa, Giacomo
and Grünwald, Thomas and Hase, Niklas and Heliasz, Michal
and Ibrom, Andreas and Knohl, Alexander and Kobler, Johannes
and Kruijt, Bart and Lange, Holger and Leppänen, Leena and
Limousin, Jean-Marc and Serrano, Francisco Ramon Lopez and
Loustau, Denis and Lukeš, Petr and Lundin, Lars and
Marzuoli, Riccardo and Mölder, Meelis and Montagnani,
Leonardo and Neirynck, Johan and Peichl, Matthias and
Rebmann, Corinna and Rubio, Eva and Santos-Reis, Margarida
and Schaaf, Crystal and Schmidt, Marius and Simioni,
Guillaume and Soudani, Kamel and Vincke, Caroline},
title = {{R}etrieval and validation of forest background
reflectivity from daily {M}oderate {R}esolution {I}maging
{S}pectroradiometer ({MODIS}) bidirectional reflectance
distribution function ({BRDF}) data across {E}uropean
forests},
journal = {Biogeosciences},
volume = {18},
number = {2},
issn = {1726-4189},
address = {Katlenburg-Lindau [u.a.]},
publisher = {Copernicus},
reportid = {FZJ-2021-03851},
pages = {621 - 635},
year = {2021},
abstract = {Information about forest background reflectance is needed
for accurate biophysical parameter retrieval from forest
canopies (overstory) with remote sensing. Separating under-
and overstory signals would enable more accurate modeling of
forest carbon and energy fluxes. We retrieved values of the
normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) of the forest
understory with the multi-angular Moderate Resolution
Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) bidirectional reflectance
distribution function (BRDF)/albedo data (gridded 500 m
daily Collection 6 product), using a method originally
developed for boreal forests. The forest floor background
reflectance estimates from the MODIS data were compared with
in situ understory reflectance measurements carried out at
an extensive set of forest ecosystem experimental sites
across Europe. The reflectance estimates from MODIS data
were, hence, tested across diverse forest conditions and
phenological phases during the growing season to examine
their applicability for ecosystems other than boreal
forests. Here we report that the method can deliver good
retrievals, especially over different forest types with open
canopies (low foliage cover). The performance of the method
was found to be limited over forests with closed canopies
(high foliage cover), where the signal from understory
becomes too attenuated. The spatial heterogeneity of
individual field sites and the limitations and documented
quality of the MODIS BRDF product are shown to be important
for the correct assessment and validation of the retrievals
obtained with remote sensing.},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact
(POF4-217)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000613959500003},
doi = {10.5194/bg-18-621-2021},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/901828},
}