000902073 001__ 902073
000902073 005__ 20230123110538.0
000902073 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.scog.2021.100215
000902073 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/28851
000902073 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:114620546
000902073 0247_ $$2pmid$$a34692428
000902073 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000728756700011
000902073 037__ $$aFZJ-2021-04013
000902073 041__ $$aEnglish
000902073 082__ $$a610
000902073 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMuthesius, Ana$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000902073 245__ $$aPreserved metacognition despite impaired perception of intentionality cues in schizophrenia
000902073 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier Science$$c2022
000902073 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000902073 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000902073 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1635334523_25410
000902073 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000902073 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000902073 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000902073 520__ $$aSocial cognition and metacognition are frequently impaired in schizophrenia, and these impairments complicate recovery. Recent work suggests that different aspects of metacognition may not be impaired to the same degree. Furthermore, metacognition and the cognitive capacity being monitored need not be similarly impaired. Here, we assessed performance in detecting cues of intentional behaviour as well as metacognition about detecting those cues in schizophrenia. Thirty patients and controls categorized animations of moving dots into those displaying a dyadic interaction demonstrating a chase or no chase and indicated their confidence in these judgments. Perception and metacognition were assessed using signal detection theoretic measures, which were analysed using frequentist and Bayesian statistics. Patients showed a deficit compared to controls in detecting intentionality cues, but showed preserved metacognitive performance into this task. Our study reveals a selective deficit in the perception of intentionality cues, but preserved metacognitive insight into the validity of this perception. It thus appears that impairment of metacognition in schizophrenia varies across cognitive domains - metacognition should not be considered a monolithic stone that is either impaired or unimpaired.
000902073 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251$$a5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability (POF4-525)$$cPOF4-525$$fPOF IV$$x0
000902073 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
000902073 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aGrothey, Farina$$b1
000902073 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aCunningham, Carter$$b2
000902073 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHölzer, Susanne$$b3
000902073 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)176404$$aVogeley, Kai$$b4$$ufzj
000902073 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSchultz, Johannes$$b5$$eCorresponding author
000902073 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2800609-4$$a10.1016/j.scog.2021.100215$$gVol. 27, p. 100215 -$$p100215 -$$tSchizophrenia research: cognition$$v27$$x2215-0013$$y2022
000902073 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/902073/files/Muthesius_2022_Schizophr%20Res%20cogn_Preserved%20metacognition....pdf$$yOpenAccess
000902073 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:902073$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000902073 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)176404$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b4$$kFZJ
000902073 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lNatural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing$$vDecoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction$$x0
000902073 9141_ $$y2022
000902073 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCND4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
000902073 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000902073 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0561$$2StatID$$aArticle Processing Charges$$d2020-09-29
000902073 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0700$$2StatID$$aFees$$d2020-09-29
000902073 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2022-11-08
000902073 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2022-11-08
000902073 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2021-01-26T13:09:06Z
000902073 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2021-01-26T13:09:06Z
000902073 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Blind peer review$$d2021-01-26T13:09:06Z
000902073 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2022-11-08
000902073 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0112$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bEmerging Sources Citation Index$$d2022-11-08
000902073 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2022-11-08
000902073 920__ $$lyes
000902073 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406$$kINM-3$$lKognitive Neurowissenschaften$$x0
000902073 980__ $$ajournal
000902073 980__ $$aVDB
000902073 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000902073 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
000902073 9801_ $$aFullTexts