% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Muthesius:902073,
      author       = {Muthesius, Ana and Grothey, Farina and Cunningham, Carter
                      and Hölzer, Susanne and Vogeley, Kai and Schultz, Johannes},
      title        = {{P}reserved metacognition despite impaired perception of
                      intentionality cues in schizophrenia},
      journal      = {Schizophrenia research: cognition},
      volume       = {27},
      issn         = {2215-0013},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2021-04013},
      pages        = {100215 -},
      year         = {2022},
      abstract     = {Social cognition and metacognition are frequently impaired
                      in schizophrenia, and these impairments complicate recovery.
                      Recent work suggests that different aspects of metacognition
                      may not be impaired to the same degree. Furthermore,
                      metacognition and the cognitive capacity being monitored
                      need not be similarly impaired. Here, we assessed
                      performance in detecting cues of intentional behaviour as
                      well as metacognition about detecting those cues in
                      schizophrenia. Thirty patients and controls categorized
                      animations of moving dots into those displaying a dyadic
                      interaction demonstrating a chase or no chase and indicated
                      their confidence in these judgments. Perception and
                      metacognition were assessed using signal detection theoretic
                      measures, which were analysed using frequentist and Bayesian
                      statistics. Patients showed a deficit compared to controls
                      in detecting intentionality cues, but showed preserved
                      metacognitive performance into this task. Our study reveals
                      a selective deficit in the perception of intentionality
                      cues, but preserved metacognitive insight into the validity
                      of this perception. It thus appears that impairment of
                      metacognition in schizophrenia varies across cognitive
                      domains - metacognition should not be considered a
                      monolithic stone that is either impaired or unimpaired.},
      cin          = {INM-3},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
      pnm          = {5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability
                      (POF4-525)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {34692428},
      UT           = {WOS:000728756700011},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.scog.2021.100215},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/902073},
}