% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Poehls:902086,
author = {Poehls, L. M. Bolzani and Fieback, M. C. R. and
Hoffmann-Eifert, S. and Copetti, T. and Brum, E. and Menzel,
Stephan and Hamdioui, S. and Gemmeke, T.},
title = {{R}eview of {M}anufacturing {P}rocess {D}efects and {T}heir
{E}ffects on {M}emristive {D}evices},
journal = {Journal of electronic testing},
volume = {47},
issn = {1573-0727},
address = {Dordrecht [u.a.]},
publisher = {Springer Science + Business Media B.V},
reportid = {FZJ-2021-04026},
pages = {1},
year = {2021},
abstract = {Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor (CMOS) technology
has been scaled down over the last forty years making
possible the design of high-performance applications,
following the predictions made by Gordon Moore and Robert H.
Dennard in the 1970s. However, there is a growing concern
that device scaling, while maintaining cost-effective
production, will become infeasible below a certain feature
size. In parallel, emerging applications including
Internet-of-Things (IoT) and big data applications present
high demands in terms of storage and computing capability,
combined with challenging constraints in terms of size,
power consumption and response latency. In this scenario,
memristive devices have become promising candidates to
complement the CMOS technology due to their CMOS
manufacturing process compatibility, great scalability and
high density, zero standby power consumption and their
capacity to implement high density memories as well as new
computing paradigms. Despite these advantages, memristive
devices are also susceptible to manufacturing defects that
may cause unique faulty behaviors that are not seen in CMOS,
increasing significantly the complexity of test procedures.
This paper provides a review about the manufacturing process
of memristives devices, focusing on Valence Change Mechanism
(VCM)-based memristive devices, and a comparative analysis
of the CMOS and memristive device manufacturing processes.
Moreover, this paper identifies possible manufacturing
failure mechanisms that may affect these novel devices,
completing the list of the already known mechanisms, and
provides a discussion about possible faulty behaviors. Note
that the identification of these mechanisms provides
insights regarding the possible memristive devices’
defective behaviors, enabling to derive more accurate fault
models and consequently, more suitable test procedures.},
cin = {PGI-7 / JARA-FIT / PGI-10},
ddc = {670},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)PGI-7-20110106 / $I:(DE-82)080009_20140620$ /
I:(DE-Juel1)PGI-10-20170113},
pnm = {5233 - Memristive Materials and Devices (POF4-523) /
Verbundprojekt: Neuro-inspirierte Technologien der
künstlichen Intelligenz für die Elektronik der Zukunft -
NEUROTEC -, Teilvorhaben: Forschungszentrum Jülich
(16ES1133K)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5233 / G:(BMBF)16ES1133K},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000709238700001},
doi = {10.1007/s10836-021-05968-8},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/902086},
}