Home > Publications database > Tomato leaves under stress: a comparison of stress response to mild abiotic stress between a cultivated and a wild tomato species > print

001     902162
005     20211130111104.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1007/s11103-021-01194-0
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0167-4412
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1573-5028
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/28869
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a 34677706
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000710377900001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2021-04071
082 _ _ |a 580
100 1 _ |a Reimer, Julia J.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)185905
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Tomato leaves under stress: a comparison of stress response to mild abiotic stress between a cultivated and a wild tomato species
260 _ _ |a Dordrecht [u.a.]
|c 2021
|b Springer Science + Business Media B.V
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1635864192_9093
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Tomato is one of the most produced crop plants on earth and growing in the fields and greenhouses all over the world. Breeding with known traits of wild species can enhance stress tolerance of cultivated crops. In this study, we investigated responses of the transcriptome as well as primary and secondary metabolites in leaves of a cultivated and a wild tomato to several abiotic stresses such as nitrogen deficiency, chilling or warmer temperatures, elevated light intensities and combinations thereof. The wild species responded different to varied temperature conditions compared to the cultivated tomato. Nitrogen deficiency caused the strongest responses and induced in particular the secondary metabolism in both species but to much higher extent in the cultivated tomato. Our study supports the potential of a targeted induction of valuable secondary metabolites in green residues of horticultural production, that will otherwise only be composted after fruit harvest. In particular, the cultivated tomato showed a strong induction in the group of mono caffeoylquinic acids in response to nitrogen deficiency. In addition, the observed differences in stress responses between cultivated and wild tomato can lead to new breeding targets for better stress tolerance.
536 _ _ |a 2171 - Biological and environmental resources for sustainable use (POF4-217)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2171
|c POF4-217
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Thiele, Björn
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129410
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Biermann, Robin T.
|0 0000-0001-5651-2257
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Junker-Frohn, Laura V.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)168454
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Wiese-Klinkenberg, Anika
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129419
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Usadel, Björn
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)145719
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Wormit, Alexandra
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |a 10.1007/s11103-021-01194-0
|g Vol. 107, no. 3, p. 177 - 206
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1475712-6
|n 3
|p 177 - 206
|t Plant molecular biology
|v 107
|y 2021
|x 1573-5028
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/902162/files/Reimer2021_Article_TomatoLeavesUnderStressACompar.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:902162
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)185905
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129410
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)168454
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129419
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)145719
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt
|l Erde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Für eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von Ressourcen zu Produkten
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2171
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2021
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2021-01-31
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2021-01-31
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2021-01-31
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2021-01-31
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
|d 2021-01-31
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
|d 2021-01-31
915 _ _ |a DEAL Springer
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)3002
|2 StatID
|d 2021-01-31
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2021-01-31
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2021-01-31
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2021-01-31
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b PLANT MOL BIOL : 2019
|d 2021-01-31
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2021-01-31
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2021-01-31
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2021-01-31
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-4-20200403
|k IBG-4
|l Bioinformatik
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
|k IBG-2
|l Pflanzenwissenschaften
|x 1
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
|k IBG-3
|l Agrosphäre
|x 2
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-4-20200403
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
980 1 _ |a FullTexts

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21