Hauptseite > Workflowsammlungen > Publikationsgebühren > Consistent Interpretation of Electrical and Optical Transients in Halide Perovskite Layers and Solar Cells > print

001     902195
005     20240712084516.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1002/aenm.202102290
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1614-6832
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1614-6840
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a altmetric:115643888
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a WOS:000710101200001
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a 2128/31289
|2 Handle
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2021-04092
082 _ _ |a 050
100 1 _ |a Krückemeier, Lisa
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)173073
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Consistent Interpretation of Electrical and Optical Transients in Halide Perovskite Layers and Solar Cells
260 _ _ |a Weinheim
|c 2021
|b Wiley-VCH
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1655189443_23411
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Transient photoluminescence (TPL) and transient photovoltage (TPV) measurements are important and frequently applied methods to study recombination dynamics and charge-carrier lifetimes in the field of halide-perovskite photovoltaics. However, large-signal TPL and small-signal TPV decay times often correlate poorly and differ by orders of magnitude. In order to generate a quantitative understanding of the differences and similarities between the two methods, the impact of sample type (film vs device), large- versus small-signal analysis, and differences in detection mode (voltage vs. luminescence) are explained using analytical and numerical models compared with experimental data. The main solution to achieving a consistent framework that describes both methods is the calculation of a voltage or carrier density dependent decay time that can be interpreted in terms of a capacitive region, a region dominated by defect-assisted recombination and a region that is dominated by higher order recombination (radiative and Auger). It is experimentally shown that in the efficient methylammonium lead-iodide solar cells, effective monomolecular lifetimes ≈2 µs can be consistently measured with TPL and TPV. Furthermore, the shape of the decay time versus voltage or carrier density follows predictions derived from implicit and explicit solutions to differential equations.
536 _ _ |a 1215 - Simulations, Theory, Optics, and Analytics (STOA) (POF4-121)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1215
|c POF4-121
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Liu, Zhifa
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)169264
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Krogmeier, Benedikt
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)169731
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Rau, Uwe
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)143905
|b 3
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Kirchartz, Thomas
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)159457
|b 4
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |a 10.1002/aenm.202102290
|g p. 2102290 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2594556-7
|n 46
|p 2102290
|t Advanced energy materials
|v 11
|y 2021
|x 1614-6840
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/902195/files/Advanced%20Energy%20Materials%20-%202021%20-%20Kr%20ckemeier%20-%20Consistent%20Interpretation%20of%20Electrical%20and%20Optical%20Transients%20in%20Halide.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:902195
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC_DEAL
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
|q OpenAPC
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)173073
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)169264
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)169731
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)143905
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)159457
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Energie
|l Materialien und Technologien für die Energiewende (MTET)
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-120
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-121
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Photovoltaik und Windenergie
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1215
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2021
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2021-01-30
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2021-01-30
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1160
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
|d 2021-01-30
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2021-01-30
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b ADV ENERGY MATER : 2019
|d 2021-01-30
915 _ _ |a DEAL Wiley
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)3001
|2 StatID
|d 2021-01-30
|w ger
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2021-01-30
915 _ _ |a IF >= 25
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9925
|2 StatID
|b ADV ENERGY MATER : 2019
|d 2021-01-30
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2021-01-30
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2021-01-30
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
|d 2021-01-30
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2021-01-30
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2021-01-30
915 p c |a APC keys set
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0000
915 p c |a Local Funding
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0001
915 p c |a DFG OA Publikationskosten
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0002
915 p c |a DEAL: Wiley 2019
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0120
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-5-20101013
|k IEK-5
|l Photovoltaik
|x 0
980 1 _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-5-20101013
980 _ _ |a APC
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IMD-3-20101013

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21