000902251 001__ 902251
000902251 005__ 20250310131245.0
000902251 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1186/s12302-021-00496-w
000902251 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0934-3504
000902251 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1865-5084
000902251 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a2190-4707
000902251 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a2190-4715
000902251 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/28940
000902251 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:106024767
000902251 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:001427601200001
000902251 037__ $$aFZJ-2021-04121
000902251 082__ $$a610
000902251 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)164361$$aSiebers, Nina$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000902251 245__ $$aSubsoils—a sink for excess fertilizer P but a minor contribution to P plant nutrition: evidence from long-term fertilization trials
000902251 260__ $$aHeidelberg$$bSpringer$$c2021
000902251 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000902251 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000902251 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1636384714_22372
000902251 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000902251 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000902251 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000902251 520__ $$aBackgroundThe phosphorus (P) stocks of arable subsoils not only influence crop production but also fertilizer P sequestration. However, the extent of this influence is largely unknown. This study aimed to (i) determine the extent of P sequestration with soil depth, (ii) analyze P speciation after long-term P fertilization, and (iii) compare soil P tests in predicting crop yields. We analyzed four long-term fertilizer trials in Germany to a depth of 90 cm. Treatments received either mineral or organic P, or a combination of both, for 16 to 113 years. We determined inorganic and organic P pools using sequential extraction, and P speciation using 31P nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) spectroscopy. In addition, we applied three P soil tests, double-lactate (DL), calcium acetate lactate (CAL), and diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT).ResultsThe results suggested that plants are capable of mobilizing P from deeper soil layers when there is a negative P budget of the topsoil. However, fertilization mostly only showed insignificant effects on P pools, which were most pronounced in the topsoil, with a 1.6- to 4.4-fold increase in labile inorganic P (Pi; resin-P, NaHCO3–Pi) after mineral fertilization and a 0- to 1.9-fold increase of organic P (Po; NaHCO3–Po, NaOH–Po) after organic P fertilization. The differences in Po and Pi speciation were mainly controlled by site-specific factors, e.g., soil properties or soil management practice rather than by fertilization. When modeling crop yield response using the Mitscherlich equation, we obtained the highest R2 (R2 = 0.61, P < 0.001) among the soil P tests when using topsoil PDGT. However, the fit became less pronounced when incorporating the subsoil.ConclusionWe conclude that if the soil has a good P supply, the majority of P taken up by plants originates from the topsoil and that the DGT method is a mechanistic surrogate of P plant uptake. Thus, DGT is a basis for optimization of P fertilizer recommendation to add as much P fertilizer as required to sustain crop yields but as low as necessary to prevent harmful P leaching of excess fertilizer P.
000902251 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173$$a2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact (POF4-217)$$cPOF4-217$$fPOF IV$$x0
000902251 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
000902251 7001_ $$aWang, Liming$$b1
000902251 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)172719$$aFunk, Theresa$$b2
000902251 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$avon Tucher, Sabine$$b3
000902251 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMerbach, Ines$$b4
000902251 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSchweitzer, Kathlin$$b5
000902251 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)174576$$aKruse, Jens$$b6$$ufzj
000902251 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2593962-2$$a10.1186/s12302-021-00496-w$$gVol. 33, no. 1, p. 60$$n1$$p60$$tEnvironmental sciences Europe$$v33$$x2190-4715$$y2021
000902251 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/902251/files/PDF.js%20viewer.pdf
000902251 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/902251/files/Siebers2021_Article_SubsoilsASinkForExcessFertiliz.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000902251 8767_ $$8SN-2021-00640-b$$92021-10-27$$d2021-11-05$$eAPC$$jDEAL$$lDEAL: Springer$$zBelegnr.: 1200173122
000902251 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:902251$$pdnbdelivery$$popenCost$$pVDB$$pdriver$$pOpenAPC$$popen_access$$popenaire
000902251 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)164361$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000902251 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)174576$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b6$$kFZJ
000902251 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173$$aDE-HGF$$bForschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt$$lErde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten$$vFür eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von Ressourcen zu Produkten$$x0
000902251 9141_ $$y2021
000902251 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2021-01-29
000902251 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2021-01-29
000902251 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews$$d2021-01-29
000902251 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1190$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBiological Abstracts$$d2021-01-29
000902251 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000902251 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bENVIRON SCI EUR : 2019$$d2021-01-29
000902251 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9905$$2StatID$$aIF >= 5$$bENVIRON SCI EUR : 2019$$d2021-01-29
000902251 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2021-01-29
000902251 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2021-01-29
000902251 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2021-01-29
000902251 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0700$$2StatID$$aFees$$d2021-01-29
000902251 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2021-01-29
000902251 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000902251 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Blind peer review$$d2021-01-29
000902251 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0561$$2StatID$$aArticle Processing Charges$$d2021-01-29
000902251 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences$$d2021-01-29
000902251 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2021-01-29
000902251 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2021-01-29
000902251 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000902251 980__ $$ajournal
000902251 980__ $$aVDB
000902251 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000902251 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000902251 980__ $$aAPC
000902251 9801_ $$aAPC
000902251 9801_ $$aFullTexts