% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Emmerichs:902283,
author = {Emmerichs, Tamara and Franco, Bruno and Wespes, Catherine
and Kumar, Vinod and Pozzer, Andrea and Rosanka, Simon and
Taraborrelli, Domenico},
title = {{T}he influence of weather-driven processes on tropospheric
ozone},
journal = {Atmospheric chemistry and physics / Discussions},
volume = {},
issn = {1680-7367},
address = {Katlenburg-Lindau},
publisher = {EGU},
reportid = {FZJ-2021-04146},
pages = {},
year = {2021},
abstract = {Abstract. Near-surface ozone is an harmful air pollutant,
which is determined to a considerable extent by
weather-controlled processes, and may be significantly
impacted by water vapour forming complexes with peroxy
radicals. The role of water in the reaction of HO2 radical
with nitrogen oxides is known from the literature, and in
current models the water complex is considered by assuming a
linear dependence on water concentrations. In fact, recent
experimental evidence has been published, showing the
significant role of water on the kinetics of one of the most
important reaction for ozone chemistry, namely NO2 + OH.
Here, the available kinetic data for the HOx + NOx reactions
have been included in the atmospheric chemistry model
ECHAM5/MESSy (EMAC) to test its global significance. Among
the modified kinetics, the newly added HNO3 channel from HO2
+ NO, dominates, significantly reducing NO2. A major removal
process of near-surface ozone is dry deposition accounting
for 20 $\%$ of the total tropospheric ozone loss mostly
occurring over vegetation. However, parameterizations for
modelling dry deposition represent a major source of
uncertainty for tropospheric ozone simulations. This
potentially belongs to the reasons why global models, such
as EMAC used here, overestimate ozone with respect to
observations. In fact, the employed parameterization is
hardly sensitive to local meteorological conditions (e.g.,
humidity) and lacks non-stomatal deposition. In this study,
a dry deposition scheme including these features have been
used in EMAC, affecting not only the deposition of ozone but
of its precursors, resulting in lower chemical production of
ozone. Additionally, we improved the emissions of isoprene
and nitrous acid (HONO). Namely, for isoprene emissions we
have accounted for the impact of drought stress which
confers a higher model sensitivity to meteorology leading to
reduced annual emissions down to 32 $\%.$ For HONO, we have
implemented soil emissions, which depend on soil moisture
and thus on precipitation. We estimate for the first time a
global source strength of 7 Tg(N) a−1. Furthermore, the
usage of a parameterization for the production of lightning
NOx that depends on cloud top height contributes to a more
realistic representation of NO2 columns over remote oceans
with respect to the satellite measurements of the Ozone
Monitoring Instrument (OMI). The combination of all the
model modifications reduces the simulated global ozone
burden by ≈ 20 $\%$ to 337 Tg, which is in better
agreement with recent estimates. By comparing simulation
results with measurements from the Infrared Atmospheric
Sounding Interferometer (IASI) and the Tropospheric Ozone
Assessment Report (TOAR) databases (of 2009) we demonstrate
an overall reduction of the ozone bias by a factor of 2.},
cin = {IEK-8},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013},
pnm = {2111 - Air Quality (POF4-211)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2111},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
doi = {10.5194/acp-2021-584},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/902283},
}