000902348 001__ 902348
000902348 005__ 20220131120350.0
000902348 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102324
000902348 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/28994
000902348 0247_ $$2pmid$$a32702624
000902348 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000561850100011
000902348 037__ $$aFZJ-2021-04197
000902348 082__ $$a610
000902348 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)172782$$aOrth, Linda$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000902348 245__ $$aAltered functional connectivity during evaluation of self-relevance in women with borderline personality disorder
000902348 260__ $$a[Amsterdam u.a.]$$bElsevier$$c2020
000902348 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000902348 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000902348 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1636625398_17480
000902348 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000902348 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000902348 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000902348 520__ $$aSelf-relevant functional abnormalities and identity disorders constitute the core psychopathological components in borderline personality disorder (BPD). Evidence suggests that appraising the relevance of environmental information to the self may be altered in BPD. However, only a few studies have examined self-relevance (SR) in BPD, and the neural correlates of SR processing has not yet been investigated in this patient group. The current study sought to evaluate brain activation differences between female patients with BPD and healthy controls during SR processing. A task-based fMRI paradigm was applied to evaluate SR processing in 23 female patients with BPD and 23 matched healthy controls. Participants were presented with a set of short sentences and were instructed to rate the stimuli. The differences in fMRI signals between SR rating (task of interest) and valence rating (control task) were examined. During SR rating, participants showed elevated activations of the cortical midline structures (CMS), known to be involved in the processing of self-related stimuli. Furthermore, we observed an elevated activation of the supplementary motor area (SMA) and the regions belonging to the mirror neuron system (MNS). Using whole-brain, seed-based connectivity analysis on the task-based fMRI data, we studied connectivity of networks anchored to the main CMS regions. We found a discrepancy in the connectivity pattern between patients and controls regarding connectivity of the CMS regions with the basal ganglia-thalamus complex. These observations have two main implications: First, they confirm the involvement of the CMS in SR evaluations of our stimuli and add evidence about the involvement of an extended network including the MNS and the SMA in this task. Second, the functional connectivity profile observed in BPD provides evidence for an altered functional interplay between the CMS and the brain regions involved in salience detection and reward evaluation, including the basal ganglia and the thalamus.
000902348 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253$$a5253 - Neuroimaging (POF4-525)$$cPOF4-525$$fPOF IV$$x0
000902348 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
000902348 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aZweerings, Jana$$b1
000902348 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aIbrahim, Camellia N.$$b2
000902348 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131781$$aNeuner, Irene$$b3
000902348 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSarkheil, Pegah$$b4
000902348 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2701571-3$$a10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102324$$gVol. 27, p. 102324 -$$p102324 -$$tNeuroImage: Clinical$$v27$$x2213-1582$$y2020
000902348 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/902348/files/1-s2.0-S2213158220301613-main.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000902348 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:902348$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000902348 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131781$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
000902348 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lNatural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing$$vDecoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction$$x0
000902348 9141_ $$y2021
000902348 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2021-02-02
000902348 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2021-02-02
000902348 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2021-02-02
000902348 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCND4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
000902348 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bNEUROIMAGE-CLIN : 2019$$d2021-02-02
000902348 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2021-02-02
000902348 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2021-02-02
000902348 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1110$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Clinical Medicine$$d2021-02-02
000902348 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0700$$2StatID$$aFees$$d2021-02-02
000902348 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2021-02-02
000902348 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2021-02-02
000902348 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000902348 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Peer review$$d2021-02-02
000902348 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0561$$2StatID$$aArticle Processing Charges$$d2021-02-02
000902348 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2021-02-02
000902348 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0320$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bPubMed Central$$d2021-02-02
000902348 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2021-02-02
000902348 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406$$kINM-4$$lPhysik der Medizinischen Bildgebung$$x0
000902348 9201_ $$0I:(DE-82)080010_20140620$$kJARA-BRAIN$$lJARA-BRAIN$$x1
000902348 980__ $$ajournal
000902348 980__ $$aVDB
000902348 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406
000902348 980__ $$aI:(DE-82)080010_20140620
000902348 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000902348 9801_ $$aFullTexts