% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Boccadoro:902350,
      author       = {Boccadoro, Sara and Wagels, Lisa and Puiu, Andrei A. and
                      Votinov, Mikhail and Weidler, Carmen and Veselinovic, Tanja
                      and Demko, Zachary and Raine, Adrian and Neuner, Irene},
      title        = {{A} meta-analysis on shared and distinct neural correlates
                      of the decision-making underlying altruistic and retaliatory
                      punishment},
      journal      = {Human brain mapping},
      volume       = {42},
      number       = {17},
      issn         = {1097-0193},
      address      = {New York, NY},
      publisher    = {Wiley-Liss},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2021-04199},
      pages        = {5547 - 5562},
      year         = {2021},
      abstract     = {Individuals who violate social norms will most likely face
                      social punishment sanctions. Those sanctions are based on
                      different motivation aspects, depending on the context.
                      Altruistic punishment occurs if punishment aims to
                      re-establish the social norms even at cost for the punisher.
                      Retaliatory punishment is driven by anger or spite and aims
                      to harm the other. While neuroimaging research highlighted
                      the neural networks supporting decision-making in both types
                      of punishment in isolation, it remains unclear whether they
                      rely on the same or distinct neural systems. We ran an
                      activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis on functional
                      magnetic resonance imaging data on 24 altruistic and 19
                      retaliatory punishment studies to investigate the neural
                      correlates of decision-making underlying social punishment
                      and whether altruistic and retaliatory punishments share
                      similar brain networks. Social punishment reliably activated
                      the bilateral insula, inferior frontal gyrus, midcingulate
                      cortex (MCC), and superior and medial frontal gyri. This
                      network largely overlapped with activation clusters found
                      for altruistic punishment. However, retaliatory punishment
                      revealed only one cluster in a posterior part of the MCC,
                      which was not recruited in altruistic punishment. Our
                      results support previous models on social punishment and
                      highlight differential involvement of the MCC in altruistic
                      and retaliatory punishments, reflecting the underlying
                      different motivations.},
      cin          = {INM-4 / INM-10 / JARA-BRAIN},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)INM-10-20170113 /
                      I:(DE-Juel1)VDB1046},
      pnm          = {5253 - Neuroimaging (POF4-525)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:34415078},
      UT           = {WOS:000686574200001},
      doi          = {10.1002/hbm.25635},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/902350},
}