% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Kumar:902392,
author = {Kumar, Vinod and Remmers, Julia and Beirle, Steffen and
Fallmann, Joachim and Kerkweg, Astrid and Lelieveld, Jos and
Mertens, Mariano and Pozzer, Andrea and Steil, Benedikt and
Barra, Marc and Tost, Holger and Wagner, Thomas},
title = {{E}valuation of the coupled high-resolution atmospheric
chemistry model system {MECO}(n) using in situ and
{MAX}-{DOAS} ${NO}\<sub\>2\</sub\>$ measurements},
journal = {Atmospheric measurement techniques},
volume = {14},
number = {7},
issn = {1867-8548},
address = {Katlenburg-Lindau},
publisher = {Copernicus},
reportid = {FZJ-2021-04226},
pages = {5241 - 5269},
year = {2021},
abstract = {We present high spatial resolution (up to 2.2×2.2 km2)
simulations focussed over south-west Germany using the
online coupled regional atmospheric chemistry model system
MECO(n) (MESSy-fied ECHAM and COSMO models nested n times).
Numerical simulation of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) surface
volume mixing ratios (VMRs) are compared to in situ
measurements from a network with 193 locations including
background, traffic-adjacent and industrial stations to
investigate the model's performance in simulating the
spatial and temporal variability of short-lived chemical
species. We show that the use of a high-resolution and
up-to-date emission inventory is crucial for reproducing the
spatial variability and resulted in good agreement with the
measured VMRs at the background and industrial locations
with an overall bias of less than $10 \%.$ We introduce a
computationally efficient approach that simulates diurnal
and daily variability in monthly-resolved anthropogenic
emissions to resolve the temporal variability of
NO2.MAX-DOAS (Multiple AXis Differential Optical Absorption
Spectroscopy) measurements performed at Mainz (49.99∘ N,
8.23∘ E) were used to evaluate the simulated
tropospheric vertical column densities (VCDs) of NO2. We
propose a consistent and robust approach to evaluate the
vertical distribution of NO2 in the boundary layer by
comparing the individual differential slant column densities
(dSCDs) at various elevation angles. This approach considers
details of the spatial heterogeneity and sensitivity volume
of the MAX-DOAS measurements while comparing the measured
and simulated dSCDs. The effects of clouds on the agreement
between MAX-DOAS measurements and simulations have also been
investigated. For low elevation angles (≤8∘), small
biases in the range of $−14 \%$ to $+7 \%$ and Pearson
correlation coefficients in the range of 0.5 to 0.8 were
achieved for different azimuth directions in the cloud-free
cases, indicating good model performance in the layers close
to the surface. Accounting for diurnal and daily variability
in the monthly-resolved anthropogenic emissions was found to
be crucial for the accurate representation of time series of
measured NO2 VMR and dSCDs and is particularly critical when
vertical mixing is suppressed, and the atmospheric lifetime
of NO2 is relatively long.},
cin = {IEK-8},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013},
pnm = {2111 - Air Quality (POF4-211)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2111},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000680219400004},
doi = {10.5194/amt-14-5241-2021},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/902392},
}