% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Robert:902556,
author = {Robert, H. L. and Lobato, I. and Lyu, F. J. and Chen, Qi
and Van Aert, S. and Van Dyck, D. and Müller-Caspary, K.},
title = {{D}ynamical diffraction of high-energy electrons
investigated by focal series momentum-resolved scanning
transmission electron microscopy at atomic resolution},
journal = {Ultramicroscopy},
volume = {233},
issn = {0304-3991},
address = {Amsterdam},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {FZJ-2021-04355},
pages = {113425 -},
year = {2022},
abstract = {We report a study of scattering dynamics in crystals
employing momentum-resolved scanning transmission electron
microscopy under varying illumination conditions. As we
perform successive changes of the probe focus, multiple
real-space signals are obtained in dependence of the shape
of the incident electron wave. With support from extensive
simulations, each signal is shown to be characterised by an
optimum focus for which the contrast is maximum and which
differs among different signals. For instance, a systematic
focus mismatch is found between images formed by high-angle
scattering, being sensitive to thickness and chemical
composition, and the first moment in diffraction space,
being sensitive to electric fields. It follows that a single
recording at one specific probe focus is usually
insufficient to characterise materials comprehensively. Most
importantly, we demonstrate in experiment and simulation
that the second moment of the diffracted intensity exhibits
a contrast maximum when the electron probe is focused at the
top and bottom faces of the specimen, making the presented
concept attractive for measuring local topography. Given the
versatility of , we furthermore present a detailed study of
its large-angle convergence both analytically using the Mott
scattering approach, and by dynamical simulations using the
multislice algorithm including thermal diffuse scattering.
Both approaches are in very good agreement and yield
logarithmic divergence with increasing scattering angle.},
cin = {ER-C-1},
ddc = {570},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)ER-C-1-20170209},
pnm = {5351 - Platform for Correlative, In Situ and Operando
Characterization (POF4-535) / Ptychography 4.0 - Proposal
for a pilot project "Information $\&$ Data Science"
(ZT-I-0025)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5351 / G:(DE-HGF)ZT-I-0025},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {34800894},
UT = {WOS:000734396800009},
doi = {10.1016/j.ultramic.2021.113425},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/902556},
}