% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Bieroza:902927,
author = {Bieroza, M. Z. and Bol, R. and Glendell, M.},
title = {{W}hat is the deal with the {G}reen {D}eal: {W}ill the new
strategy help to improve {E}uropean freshwater quality
beyond the {W}ater {F}ramework {D}irective?},
journal = {The science of the total environment},
volume = {791},
issn = {0048-9697},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {FZJ-2021-04680},
pages = {148080 -},
year = {2021},
abstract = {Agricultural land use covers almost half of the EU
territory and reducing nutrient and pesticide losses to
freshwaters is central to existing EU policy. However, the
progress of improving freshwater quality and reducing
eutrophication is slow and lags behind targets. The Green
Deal is a key element of the EU plans to implement the
United Nation's Sustainable Development Goals. Here, we
discuss the opportunities that the Green Deal and associated
strategies may provide for the achievement of the water
quality goals of the Water Framework Directive in
agricultural landscapes. We welcome Green Deal's
aspirational stated goals. However, the reliance of
mitigation of diffuse agricultural pollution on the reform
of the Common Agricultural Policy represents grave risks for
practical implementation and the achievement of the Green
Deal objectives. We also argue that the new strategies
should be targeted at tackling and understanding the sources
of water quality problems along the full pollution
continuum. To maximise the opportunities for tackling
diffuse pollution from agricultural land use and achieving
the delayed water quality targets, we stress that a range of
targeted new instruments will be needed to close the gaps in
the pollution continuum ‘from source to impact’. These
gaps include: (I) smart and standardised monitoring of the
impacts of proposed eco-schemes and agri-environment-climate
measures, (ii) active restoration of agricultural streams
and ditches and their floodplains to reduce secondary
pollution sources, (iii) options to draw down nutrient
levels to or below the agronomic optimum that reduce legacy
sources, (iv) integrating farm-scale and catchment-scale
analysis of trade-offs in reducing different pollutants and
their combined effects, and finally (v) accounting for
emerging pressures to freshwater quality due to climate
change. Incorporation of the pollution continuum framework
into tackling diffuse agricultural pollution will ensure
that the European water-related policy goals are achieved.},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact
(POF4-217)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:34126496},
doi = {10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148080},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/902927},
}