000902937 001__ 902937
000902937 005__ 20220103172031.0
000902937 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.still.2021.105120
000902937 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0167-1987
000902937 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1879-3444
000902937 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/29205
000902937 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:108251405
000902937 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000687980700001
000902937 037__ $$aFZJ-2021-04690
000902937 082__ $$a640
000902937 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)179519$$aGe, Zhuang$$b0
000902937 245__ $$aDifferential long-term fertilization alters residue-derived labile organic carbon fractions and microbial community during straw residue decomposition
000902937 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier Science$$c2021
000902937 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000902937 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000902937 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1638252703_14457
000902937 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000902937 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000902937 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000902937 520__ $$aStraw residue amendment and fertilization are the key global management strategies for achieving more sustainable agriculture. However, the temporal changes in labile soil organic carbon (SOC) fractions and microbial community (MB) in response to differential long-term fertilization during straw residue decomposition remain unclear. We collected topsoil samples (0–20 cm; Mollisols) from three fertilizer management strategies (CK, no fertilization control, IF, inorganic fertilizer, and IFM, inorganic fertilizer plus manure) in a long-term field experiment. Subsequently, we conducted an in-situ micro-plot incubation experiment with and without 13C-labeled maize straw residue (δ13C = 246.9‰). We found that the straw-residue C in soil was mainly retained as particulate organic carbon (POC). The residue-derived POC was significantly increased, by 3, 5, and 20 times, whereas the residue-derived dissolved organic carbon (DOC) was significantly decreased by 71 %, 57 %, and 95 % in CK, IF, and IFM treatments, respectively, with straw addition (abbreviated as CKS, IFS, and IFMS respectively) during straw residue decomposition. The content of residue-derived microbial biomass carbon (MBC) was higher at 40.6 mg kg−1 (IFMS) and 33.0 mg kg−1 (IFS) compared to 27.0 mg kg−1 in the unfertilized (CKS) treatment at the end of the incubation period (day 150). The number of edges of the bacterial network was decreased by 16 %, 53 %, and 73 % in the treatments of CKS, IFS, and IFMS, respectively, compared with the corresponding fertilizer treatments without straw application. While the number of edges of fungal network also decreased by 57 % in CKS treatment, those in IFS and IFMS treatments increased by 160 % and 310 %, respectively. This indicated that straw residue addition decreases the bacterial microbial network complexity in all treatments, but it increases fungal network complexity in IFS and IFMS treatments. The highest microbial activities of the bacterial and fungal keystone taxa were observed on the 1 st day in the IFS treatment and on the 150th day in the CKS treatment. However, the highest microbial activities of bacterial keystone taxa were observed on the 60th day, and the highest microbial activities of fungal keystone taxa were detected on the 150th day in the IFMS treatment. The observed temporal changes in the microbial community suggested that independent of agricultural fertilizer management, straw residue-derived POC and DOC promoted fungal C processing, whereas for bacterial C, this was facilitated only by straw residue-derived MBC in these Mollisols. Highlighting straw residue incorporation helps to sustain microbial diversity and associated carbon processing in agricultural soils.
000902937 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173$$a2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact (POF4-217)$$cPOF4-217$$fPOF IV$$x0
000902937 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
000902937 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLi, Shuangyi$$b1
000902937 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)145865$$aBol, Roland$$b2
000902937 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aZhu, Ping$$b3
000902937 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aPeng, Chang$$b4
000902937 7001_ $$00000-0002-5263-7375$$aAn, Tingting$$b5
000902937 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aCheng, Na$$b6
000902937 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)179374$$aLiu, Xu$$b7
000902937 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLi, Tingyu$$b8
000902937 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aXu, Zhiqiang$$b9
000902937 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aWang, Jingkuan$$b10$$eCorresponding author
000902937 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1498737-5$$a10.1016/j.still.2021.105120$$gVol. 213, p. 105120 -$$p105120 -$$tSoil & tillage research$$v213$$x0167-1987$$y2021
000902937 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/902937/files/STILL-D-20-01275GeRB.pdf$$yPublished on 2021-06-27. Available in OpenAccess from 2023-06-27.
000902937 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:902937$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000902937 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)145865$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000902937 9101_ $$0I:(DE-HGF)0$$60000-0002-5263-7375$$aExternal Institute$$b5$$kExtern
000902937 9101_ $$0I:(DE-HGF)0$$6P:(DE-Juel1)179374$$aExternal Institute$$b7$$kExtern
000902937 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173$$aDE-HGF$$bForschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt$$lErde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten$$vFür eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von Ressourcen zu Produkten$$x0
000902937 9141_ $$y2021
000902937 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2021-01-27
000902937 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2021-01-27
000902937 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews$$d2021-01-27
000902937 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1190$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBiological Abstracts$$d2021-01-27
000902937 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search$$d2021-01-27
000902937 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCND4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
000902937 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0530$$2StatID$$aEmbargoed OpenAccess
000902937 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bSOIL TILL RES : 2019$$d2021-01-27
000902937 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2021-01-27
000902937 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2021-01-27
000902937 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2021-01-27
000902937 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC$$d2021-01-27
000902937 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences$$d2021-01-27
000902937 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2021-01-27
000902937 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz$$d2021-01-27$$wger
000902937 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2021-01-27
000902937 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000902937 980__ $$ajournal
000902937 980__ $$aVDB
000902937 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000902937 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000902937 9801_ $$aFullTexts