000902968 001__ 902968
000902968 005__ 20220103172057.0
000902968 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116852
000902968 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0013-9327
000902968 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0269-7491
000902968 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1873-6424
000902968 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1878-2450
000902968 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/29228
000902968 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:101905097
000902968 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:33740603
000902968 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000641372900010
000902968 037__ $$aFZJ-2021-04714
000902968 082__ $$a690
000902968 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)179088$$aZhang, Xin$$b0
000902968 245__ $$aInfluences of irrigation and fertilization on soil N cycle and losses from wheat–maize cropping system in northern China
000902968 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier Science$$c2021
000902968 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000902968 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000902968 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1638260609_19739
000902968 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000902968 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000902968 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000902968 520__ $$aExcess of water irrigation and fertilizer consumption by crops has resulted in high soil nitrogen (N) losses and underground water contamination not only in China but worldwide. This study explored the effects of soil N input, soil N output, as well as the effect of different irrigation and N- fertilizer managements on residual N. For this, two consecutive years of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) –summer maize (Zea mays L.) rotation was conducted with: N applied at 0 kg N ha−1 yr−1, 420 kg N ha−1 yr−1 and 600 kg N ha−1 yr−1 under fertigation (DN0, DN420, DN600), and N applied at 0 kg N ha−1 yr−1 and 600 kg N ha−1 yr−1 under flood irrigation (FN0, FN600). The results demonstrated that low irrigation water consumption resulted in a 57.2% lower of irrigation-N input (p < 0.05) in DN600 when compared to FN600, especially in a rainy year like 2015–2016. For N output, no significant difference was found with all N treatments. Soil gaseous N losses were highly correlated with fertilization (p < 0.001) and were reduced by 23.6%–41.7% when fertilizer N was decreased by 30%. Soil N leaching was highly affected by irrigation and a higher reduction was observed under saving irrigation (reduced by 33.9%–57.3%) than under optimized fertilization (reduced by 23.6%–50.7%). The net N surplus was significantly increased with N application rate but was not affected by irrigation treatments. Under the same N level (600 kg N ha−1 yr−1), fertigation increased the Total Nitrogen (TN) stock by 17.5% (0–100 cm) as compared to flood irrigation. These results highlighted the importance to further reduction of soil N losses under optimized fertilization and irrigation combined with N stabilizers or balanced- N fertilization for future agriculture development.
000902968 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173$$a2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact (POF4-217)$$cPOF4-217$$fPOF IV$$x0
000902968 588__ $$aDataset connected to DataCite
000902968 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aXiao, Guangmin$$b1
000902968 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)145865$$aBol, Roland$$b2
000902968 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aWang, Ligang$$b3
000902968 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aZhuge, Yuping$$b4
000902968 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aWu, Wenliang$$b5
000902968 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLi, Hu$$b6
000902968 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMeng, Fanqiao$$b7$$eCorresponding author
000902968 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2013037-5$$a10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116852$$gVol. 278, p. 116852 -$$p116852 -$$tEnvironmental pollution$$v278$$x0013-9327$$y2021
000902968 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/902968/files/Zhangetal2021EnvinPollRB.pdf$$yPublished on 2021-03-01. Available in OpenAccess from 2023-03-01.
000902968 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:902968$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000902968 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)145865$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000902968 9101_ $$0I:(DE-HGF)0$$6P:(DE-HGF)0$$aExternal Institute$$b6$$kExtern
000902968 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173$$aDE-HGF$$bForschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt$$lErde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten$$vFür eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von Ressourcen zu Produkten$$x0
000902968 9141_ $$y2021
000902968 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2021-02-04
000902968 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2021-02-04
000902968 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews$$d2021-02-04
000902968 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1190$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBiological Abstracts$$d2021-02-04
000902968 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1040$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bZoological Record$$d2021-02-04
000902968 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0530$$2StatID$$aEmbargoed OpenAccess
000902968 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences$$d2021-02-04
000902968 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCND4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
000902968 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9905$$2StatID$$aIF >= 5$$bENVIRON POLLUT : 2019$$d2021-02-04
000902968 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2021-02-04
000902968 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2021-02-04
000902968 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bENVIRON POLLUT : 2019$$d2021-02-04
000902968 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2021-02-04
000902968 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz$$d2021-02-04$$wger
000902968 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2021-02-04
000902968 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000902968 980__ $$ajournal
000902968 980__ $$aVDB
000902968 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000902968 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000902968 9801_ $$aFullTexts