% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Khodadadifar:902970,
author = {Khodadadifar, Tina and Soltaninejad, Zahra and Ebneabbasi,
Amir and Eickhoff, Claudia R. and Sorg, Christian and Van
Eimeren, Thilo and Vogeley, Kai and Zarei, Mojtaba and
Eickhoff, Simon B. and Tahmasian, Masoud},
title = {{I}n search of convergent regional brain abnormality in
cognitive emotion regulation: {A} transdiagnostic
neuroimaging meta‐analysis},
journal = {Human brain mapping},
volume = {43},
number = {4},
issn = {1065-9471},
address = {New York, NY},
publisher = {Wiley-Liss},
reportid = {FZJ-2021-04716},
pages = {1309-1325},
year = {2022},
abstract = {Ineffective use of adaptive cognitive strategies (e.g.,
reappraisal) to regulate emotional states is often reported
in a wide variety of psychiatric disorders, suggesting a
common characteristic across different diagnostic
categories. However, the extent of shared neurobiological
impairments is incompletely understood. This study,
therefore, aimed to identify the transdiagnostic neural
signature of disturbed reappraisal using the
coordinate-based meta-analysis (CBMA) approach. Following
the best-practice guidelines for conducting neuroimaging
meta-analyses, we systematically searched PubMed,
ScienceDirect and Web of Science databases and tracked the
references. Out of 1608 identified publications, 32
whole-brain neuroimaging studies were retrieved that
compared brain activation in patients with psychiatric
disorders and healthy controls during a reappraisal task.
Then, the reported peak coordinates of group comparisons
were extracted and several activation likelihood estimation
(ALE) analyses were performed at three hierarchical levels
to identify the potential spatial convergence: the global
level (i.e., the pooled analysis and the analyses of
in-/decreased activations), the experimental-contrast level
(i.e., the analyses of grouped data based on the regulation
goal, stimulus valence, and instruction rule) and the
disorder-group level (i.e., the analyses across the
experimental-contrast level focused on increasing
homogeneity of disorders). Surprisingly, none of our
analyses provided significant convergent findings. This CBMA
indicates a lack of transdiagnostic convergent regional
abnormality related to reappraisal task, probably due to the
complex nature of cognitive emotion regulation,
heterogeneity of clinical populations, and/or experimental
and statistical flexibility of individual studies.},
cin = {INM-7 / INM-3},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
pnm = {5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability
(POF4-525)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:34826162},
UT = {WOS:000722653400001},
doi = {10.1002/hbm.25722},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/902970},
}