001     903290
005     20220930130333.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1038/s41598-021-97940-x
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2128/29601
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a altmetric:114004800
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a pmid:34556704
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000698791600068
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2021-04986
082 _ _ |a 600
100 1 _ |a Srikantharajah, Kagithiri
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)169539
|b 0
|u fzj
245 _ _ |a Minimally-invasive insertion strategy and in vivo evaluation of multi-shank flexible intracortical probes
260 _ _ |a [London]
|c 2021
|b Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1640268751_627
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Chronically implanted neural probes are powerful tools to decode brain activity however, recording population and spiking activity over long periods remains a major challenge. Here, we designed and fabricated flexible intracortical Michigan-style arrays with a shank cross-section per electrode of 250 μm2 utilizing the polymer paryleneC with the goal to improve the immune acceptance. As flexible neural probes are unable to penetrate the brain due to the low buckling force threshold, a tissue-friendly insertion system was developed by reducing the effective shank length. The insertion strategy enabled the implantation of the four, bare, flexible shanks up to 2 mm into the mouse brain without increasing the implantation footprint and therefore, minimizing the acute trauma. In acute recordings from the mouse somatosensory cortex and the olfactory bulb, we demonstrated that the flexible probes were able to simultaneously detect local field potentials as well as single and multi-unit activity. Additionally, the flexible arrays outperformed stiff probes with respect to yield of single unit activity. Following the successful in vivo validation, we further improved the microfabrication towards a double-metal-layer process, and were able to double the number of electrodes per shank by keeping the shank width resulting in a cross-section per electrode of 118 μm2.
536 _ _ |a 5231 - Neuroscientific Foundations (POF4-523)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5231
|c POF4-523
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Medinaceli Quintela, Renata
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Doerenkamp, Kerstin
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Kampa, Björn M.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)168305
|b 3
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Musall, Simon
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)175146
|b 4
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Rothermel, Markus
|0 0000-0002-0929-993X
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Offenhäusser, Andreas
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)128713
|b 6
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |a 10.1038/s41598-021-97940-x
|g Vol. 11, no. 1, p. 18920
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2615211-3
|n 1
|p 18920
|t Scientific reports
|v 11
|y 2021
|x 2045-2322
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/903290/files/MPDL_Invoice_Beleg_1200174041.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/903290/files/s41598-021-97940-x.pdf
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:903290
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)169539
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)168305
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)175146
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)128713
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-523
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Neuromorphic Computing and Network Dynamics
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5231
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2021
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1040
|2 StatID
|b Zoological Record
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b SCI REP-UK : 2019
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320
|2 StatID
|b PubMed Central
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2021-02-03
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBI-3-20200312
|k IBI-3
|l Bioelektronik
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBI-3-20200312
980 _ _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21