001     903650
005     20231207201905.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1080/17470919.2020.1859410
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2128/29583
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a altmetric:95781045
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a pmid:33297873
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000601394000001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2021-05299
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Constantino, Francisco Cervantes
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Neural processing of iterated prisoner’s dilemma outcomes indicates next-round choice and speed to reciprocate cooperation
260 _ _ |a New York [u.a.]
|c 2021
|b Psychology Press
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1701948336_9808
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a The iterated prisoner's dilemma (iPD) game is a well established model for testing how people cooperate, yet the neural processes that unfold after its distinct outcomes have been only partly described. Recent theoretical models emphasize the ubiquity of intuitive cooperation, raising questions on both neural and behavioral timelines involved. We studied the outcome/feedback stage of iPD rounds with electroencephalography (EEG) methods. Results showed that neural signals associated to this stage also relate to future choice in an outcome-dependent manner: (i) after zero-gain ‘sucker’s payoffs’ (unreciprocated cooperation), a participant’s decision thereafter relates to changes to the feedback-related negativity (FRN); (ii) after one-sided non-cooperation (participant wins at co-player’s expense), by the P3; (iii) after mutual cooperation, by late frontal delta-band modulations. Critically, faster choices to reciprocate co-player cooperation were predicted, on a single-trial basis, by P3 and frontal delta modulations at the immediately preceding trial. Delta band signaling is considered in relation to homeostatic regulation processing in the literature. The findings relate the early outcome/feedback stage to subsequent decisional processes in the iPD, providing a first neural account of the brief timelines implied in heuristic modes of cooperation.
536 _ _ |a 5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability (POF4-525)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251
|c POF4-525
|f POF IV
|x 0
536 _ _ |a 5253 - Neuroimaging (POF4-525)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253
|c POF4-525
|f POF IV
|x 1
700 1 _ |a Nicolaisen, Eliana
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)180537
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Garat, Santiago
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Paz, Valentina
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Martínez-Montes, Eduardo
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Kessel, Dominique
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Cabana, Álvaro
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Gradin, Victoria
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
773 _ _ |a 10.1080/17470919.2020.1859410
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2234411-1
|p 103-120
|t Social neuroscience
|v 16
|y 2021
|x 1747-0919
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/903650/files/constantino2020.pdf
|y Published on 2020-12-23. Available in OpenAccess from 2021-12-23.
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:903650
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Faculty of Psychology, Universidad de la República
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)180537
910 1 _ |a Faculty of Psychology, Universidad de la República
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)180537
910 1 _ |a Faculty of Psychology, Universidad de la República
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Faculty of Psychology, Universidad de la República
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Neuroinformatics Department, Cuban Center for Neuroscience
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Faculty of Psychology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Faculty of Psychology, Universidad de la República
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Faculty of Psychology, Universidad de la República
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251
|x 0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253
|x 1
914 1 _ |y 2021
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2021-01-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2021-01-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2021-01-26
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCND4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a Embargoed OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0530
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b SOC NEUROSCI-UK : 2019
|d 2021-01-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2021-01-26
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2021-01-26
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2021-01-26
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2021-01-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2021-01-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2021-01-26
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
|k INM-7
|l Gehirn & Verhalten
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21