001     903713
005     20230128125810.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.12.018
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2128/29989
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a 35070165
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000819903300011
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2021-05353
082 _ _ |a 570
100 1 _ |a El Harrar, Till
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)176217
|b 0
|u fzj
245 _ _ |a Critical Assessment of Structure-based Approaches to Improve Protein Resistance in Aqueous Ionic Liquids by Enzyme-wide Saturation Mutagenesis
260 _ _ |a Gotenburg
|c 2022
|b Research Network of Computational and Structural Biotechnology (RNCSB)
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1674828704_21430
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Ionic liquids (IL) and aqueous ionic liquids (aIL) are attractive (co-)solvents for green industrial processes involving biocatalysts, but often reduce enzyme activity. Experimental and computational methods are applied to predict favorable substitution sites and, most often, subsequent site-directed surface charge modifications are introduced to enhance enzyme resistance towards aIL. However, almost no studies evaluate the prediction precision with random mutagenesis or the application of simple data-driven filtering processes. Here, we systematically and rigorously evaluated the performance of 22 previously described structure-based approaches to increase enzyme resistance to aIL based on an experimental complete site-saturation mutagenesis library of BsLipA screened against four aIL. We show that, surprisingly, most of the approaches yield low gain in precision (GiP) values, particularly for predicting relevant positions: 14 approaches perform worse than random mutagenesis. Encouragingly, exploiting experimental information on the thermostability of BsLipA or structural weak spots of BsLipA predicted by rigidity theory yields GiP = 3.03 and 2.39 for relevant variants and GiP = 1.61 and 1.41 for relevant positions. Combining five simple-to-compute physicochemical and evolutionary properties substantially increases the precision of predicting relevant variants and positions, yielding GiP = 3.35 and 1.29. Finally, combining these properties with predictions of structural weak spots identified by rigidity theory additionally improves GiP for relevant positions up to 4-fold to ∼10 and sustains or increases GiP for relevant positions, resulting in a prediction precision of ∼90% compared to ∼9% in random mutagenesis. This combination should be applicable to other enzyme systems for guiding protein engineering approaches towards improved aIL resistance.
536 _ _ |a 2171 - Biological and environmental resources for sustainable use (POF4-217)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2171
|c POF4-217
|f POF IV
|x 0
536 _ _ |a 2172 - Utilization of renewable carbon and energy sources and engineering of ecosystem functions (POF4-217)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2172
|c POF4-217
|f POF IV
|x 1
536 _ _ |a 5111 - Domain-Specific Simulation & Data Life Cycle Labs (SDLs) and Research Groups (POF4-511)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5111
|c POF4-511
|f POF IV
|x 2
536 _ _ |a Forschergruppe Gohlke (hkf7_20200501)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)hkf7_20200501
|c hkf7_20200501
|f Forschergruppe Gohlke
|x 3
536 _ _ |a 5241 - Molecular Information Processing in Cellular Systems (POF4-524)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5241
|c POF4-524
|f POF IV
|x 4
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Davari, Mehdi D.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Jaeger, Karl-Erich
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131457
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Schwaneberg, Ulrich
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Gohlke, Holger
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)172663
|b 4
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.12.018
|g p. S2001037021005274
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2694435-2
|p 399-409
|t Computational and structural biotechnology journal
|v 20
|y 2022
|x 2001-0370
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/903713/files/Invoice_OAD0000171845.pdf
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/903713/files/1-s2.0-S2001037021005274-main.pdf
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/903713/files/P03v17_MS_TE_final.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:903713
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)176217
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131457
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)172663
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt
|l Erde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Für eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von Ressourcen zu Produkten
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2171
|x 0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt
|l Erde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Für eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von Ressourcen zu Produkten
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2172
|x 1
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Engineering Digital Futures – Supercomputing, Data Management and Information Security for Knowledge and Action
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-510
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-511
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Enabling Computational- & Data-Intensive Science and Engineering
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5111
|x 2
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-524
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Molecular and Cellular Information Processing
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5241
|x 3
914 1 _ |y 2022
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCND4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b COMPUT STRUCT BIOTEC : 2021
|d 2022-11-18
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2022-11-18
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2022-11-18
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2022-08-08T10:59:40Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2022-08-08T10:59:40Z
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Blind peer review
|d 2022-08-08T10:59:40Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2022-11-18
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2022-11-18
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b COMPUT STRUCT BIOTEC : 2021
|d 2022-11-18
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406
|k JSC
|l Jülich Supercomputing Center
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)NIC-20090406
|k NIC
|l John von Neumann - Institut für Computing
|x 1
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBI-7-20200312
|k IBI-7
|l Strukturbiochemie
|x 2
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-4-20200403
|k IBG-4
|l Bioinformatik
|x 3
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)NIC-20090406
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBI-7-20200312
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-4-20200403
980 _ _ |a APC
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 1 _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21