% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Duarte:904019,
author = {Duarte, M. J. and Fang, X. and Rao, J. and Krieger, W. and
Brinckmann, S. and Dehm, G.},
title = {{I}n situ nanoindentation during electrochemical hydrogen
charging: a comparison between front-side and a novel
back-side charging approach},
journal = {Journal of materials science},
volume = {56},
number = {14},
issn = {0022-2461},
address = {Dordrecht [u.a.]},
publisher = {Springer Science + Business Media B.V},
reportid = {FZJ-2021-05589},
pages = {8732 - 8744},
year = {2021},
abstract = {The effects of hydrogen in metals are a pressing issue
causing severe economic losses due to material deterioration
by hydrogen embrittlement. A crucial understanding of the
interactions of hydrogen with different microstructure
features can be reached by nanoindentation due to the small
volumes probed. Even more, in situ testing while charging
the sample with hydrogen prevents the formation of
concentration gradients due to hydrogen desorption. Two
custom electrochemical cells for in situ testing were built
in-house to charge the sample with hydrogen during
nanoindentation: “front-side” charging with the sample
and the indenter tip immersed into the electrolyte, and
“back-side” charging where the analyzed region is never
in contact with the solution. During front-side charging,
surface degradation often occurs which also negatively
influences analyses after hydrogen charging. The back-side
charging approach proposed in this work is a promising
technique for studying in situ the effects of hydrogen in
alloys under mechanical loads, while completely excluding
the influence of the electrolyte on the nanoindented
surface. Hydrogen diffusion from the charged back-side
toward the testing surface is here demonstrated by Kelvin
probe measurements in ferritic FeCr alloys, used as a case
study due to the high mobility of hydrogen in the bcc
lattice. During nanoindentation, a reduction on the shear
stress necessary for dislocations nucleation due to hydrogen
was observed using both setups; however, the quantitative
data differs and a contradictory behavior was found in
hardness measurements. Finally, some guidelines for the use
of both approaches and a summary of their advantages and
disadvantages are presented.},
cin = {IEK-2},
ddc = {670},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-2-20101013},
pnm = {1231 - Electrochemistry for Hydrogen (POF4-123)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1231},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000612376700002},
doi = {10.1007/s10853-020-05749-2},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/904019},
}