% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Alberti:904032,
author = {Alberti, G. and Sala, M. and Romazanov, J. and Uccello, A.
and Dellasega, D. and Passoni, M.},
title = {{ERO}2.0 modelling of nanoscale surface morphology
evolution},
journal = {Nuclear fusion},
volume = {61},
number = {6},
issn = {0029-5515},
address = {Vienna},
publisher = {IAEA},
reportid = {FZJ-2021-05602},
pages = {066039 -},
year = {2021},
abstract = {Plasma–material interaction (PMI) in tokamaks determines
the life-time of first-wall (FW) components. Due to PMI, FW
materials are eroded and transported within the device.
Erosion is strongly influenced by the original morphology of
the component, due to particle redeposition on near surface
structures and to the changing of impact angle
distributions, which results in an alteration of the
sputtering effects. The Monte-Carlo impurity transport code
ERO2.0 is capable of modelling the erosion of non-trivial
surface morphologies due to plasma irradiation. The surface
morphology module was validated against experimental data
with satisfactory agreement. In this work, we further
progress in the validation of the ERO2.0 capabilities by
modelling both numerically generated surfaces as well as
real surfaces, generated using atomic force microscopy (AFM)
measurements of reference tungsten samples. The former are
used to validate ERO2.0 against one of the morphology
evolution models present in literature, in order to outline
the conditions for reliable code solutions. Modifications
induced in AFM-generated surfaces after argon and helium
plasma irradiation are compared, showing a similar
post-exposure morphology, mostly dominated by surface
smoothing. Finally, the ERO2.0 morphology retrieved after He
plasma exposure is compared to experimentally-available
scanning electron microscopy and AFM measurements of the
same surface morphology exposed in the linear plasma device
GyM, showing the need for further improvements of the code,
while a good agreement between experimental and simulated
erosion rate is observed.},
cin = {IEK-4},
ddc = {620},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-4-20101013},
pnm = {134 - Plasma-Wand-Wechselwirkung (POF4-134)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-134},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000656670200001},
doi = {10.1088/1741-4326/abfcde},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/904032},
}