001     904032
005     20240711113815.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1088/1741-4326/abfcde
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0029-5515
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1741-4326
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/29915
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a altmetric:106935379
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a WOS:000656670200001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2021-05602
082 _ _ |a 620
100 1 _ |a Alberti, G.
|0 0000-0001-9835-5085
|b 0
245 _ _ |a ERO2.0 modelling of nanoscale surface morphology evolution
260 _ _ |a Vienna
|c 2021
|b IAEA
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1641393953_12144
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Plasma–material interaction (PMI) in tokamaks determines the life-time of first-wall (FW) components. Due to PMI, FW materials are eroded and transported within the device. Erosion is strongly influenced by the original morphology of the component, due to particle redeposition on near surface structures and to the changing of impact angle distributions, which results in an alteration of the sputtering effects. The Monte-Carlo impurity transport code ERO2.0 is capable of modelling the erosion of non-trivial surface morphologies due to plasma irradiation. The surface morphology module was validated against experimental data with satisfactory agreement. In this work, we further progress in the validation of the ERO2.0 capabilities by modelling both numerically generated surfaces as well as real surfaces, generated using atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements of reference tungsten samples. The former are used to validate ERO2.0 against one of the morphology evolution models present in literature, in order to outline the conditions for reliable code solutions. Modifications induced in AFM-generated surfaces after argon and helium plasma irradiation are compared, showing a similar post-exposure morphology, mostly dominated by surface smoothing. Finally, the ERO2.0 morphology retrieved after He plasma exposure is compared to experimentally-available scanning electron microscopy and AFM measurements of the same surface morphology exposed in the linear plasma device GyM, showing the need for further improvements of the code, while a good agreement between experimental and simulated erosion rate is observed.
536 _ _ |a 134 - Plasma-Wand-Wechselwirkung (POF4-134)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-134
|c POF4-134
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Sala, M.
|0 0000-0002-6244-7612
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Romazanov, J.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)165905
|b 2
|e Corresponding author
700 1 _ |a Uccello, A.
|0 0000-0003-3044-1715
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Dellasega, D.
|0 0000-0002-7389-9307
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Passoni, M.
|0 0000-0002-7844-3691
|b 5
773 _ _ |a 10.1088/1741-4326/abfcde
|g Vol. 61, no. 6, p. 066039 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2037980-8
|n 6
|p 066039 -
|t Nuclear fusion
|v 61
|y 2021
|x 0029-5515
856 4 _ |y Restricted
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/904032/files/Alberti_2021_Nucl._Fusion_61_066039.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/904032/files/ERO2.0%20modelling.pdf
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:904032
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)165905
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Energie
|l Fusion
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-130
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-134
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Plasma-Wand-Wechselwirkung
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2021
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b NUCL FUSION : 2019
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a National-Konsortium
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0430
|2 StatID
|d 2021-01-27
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2021-01-27
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2021-01-27
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-4-20101013
|k IEK-4
|l Plasmaphysik
|x 0
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-4-20101013
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IFN-1-20101013


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21