% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Richardson:904068,
      author       = {Richardson, M. and Gorley, M. and Wang, Y. and Aiello, G.
                      and Pintsuk, G. and Gaganidze, E. and Richou, M. and Henry,
                      J. and Vila, R. and Rieth, M.},
      title        = {{T}echnology readiness assessment of materials for {DEMO}
                      in-vessel applications},
      journal      = {Journal of nuclear materials},
      volume       = {550},
      issn         = {0022-3115},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2021-05638},
      pages        = {152906 -},
      year         = {2021},
      note         = {kein Zugriff auf Postprint},
      abstract     = {A dedicated procedure was developed to categorize the
                      technology readiness of materials for specific DEMO
                      in-vessel fusion reactor applications. This methodology was
                      employed to assess the technological maturity of materials
                      under development within the EUROfusion materials work
                      package (WPMAT). This covers materials intended for
                      structural, high heat flux, optical and dielectric
                      applications in the European DEMO fusion reactor (breeder
                      materials and barrier coatings are not covered here). The
                      baseline materials have been assigned DEMO Material
                      Technology Readiness Levels (MTRLs) of 4 (EUROFER97), 3
                      (conventional tungsten) and 4 (Copper-Chromium-Zirconium).
                      In addition, a further 28 candidate materials (and groups of
                      materials) were also assessed. These were generally assigned
                      DEMO MTRLs in the range of 2-3. This process has highlighted
                      the wide range of materials under development within WPMAT.
                      However, it has also brought into focus the many challenges
                      facing DEMO materials development. While the lack of
                      technologically ready materials is clearly a source of risk
                      to DEMO, the introduction of a biennial review of technology
                      readiness within WPMAT is intended to facilitate more
                      effective planning and targeted materials development, in
                      line with the strategic plans of EUROfusion. This paper
                      highlights the methodologies for fusion specific material
                      technology readiness levels, their application for EU-DEMO
                      and the effectiveness of these in strategic materials
                      development.},
      cin          = {IEK-4 / IEK-2},
      ddc          = {620},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-4-20101013 / I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-2-20101013},
      pnm          = {134 - Plasma-Wand-Wechselwirkung (POF4-134)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-134},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000639224500003},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.152906},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/904068},
}