001     904076
005     20240712112902.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1088/1741-4326/abf056
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0029-5515
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1741-4326
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/29933
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a altmetric:104985066
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a WOS:000645584300001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2021-05646
082 _ _ |a 620
100 1 _ |a Sun, H. J.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)188884
|b 0
|u fzj
245 _ _ |a The role of edge plasma parameters in H-mode density limit on the JET-ILW
260 _ _ |a Vienna
|c 2021
|b IAEA
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1648536468_16798
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a A study of a dataset of JET H-mode plasma with the Be/W ITER-like wall (JET-ILW) shows that reaching the edge MHD ballooning limit leads to confinement degradation. However, unlike JET plasmas with a carbon wall (JET-C), the JET-ILW plasmas stay in a marginal dithering phase for a relatively long period, associated with a higher (≈20%) H-mode density limit (HDL) than JET-C equivalents. This suggests that ITER could be operated in H-mode with higher density than the scaling based on carbon wall devices, but likely with a dithering phase plasma with lower confinement. A new, reliable estimator for JET Er, min has been derived by combining HRTS measurements of pedestal gradient and edge-SOL decay lengths. JET radial Er ETB wells are observed in the range of −15 to −60 kV m−1 in high performance H-modes, consistent with previous CXRS results in ASDEX Upgrade. The results imply that a higher positive E × B shear in the near SOL plays a role in sustaining a marginal phase in JET-ILW which leads to a higher HDL than that in JET-C. The results of the JET-ILW dataset show agreement with the Goldston finite collisionality HD model for SOL broadening at high collisionality. A hypothesis for the dithering H-mode phase is proposed: as ne,SOL increases, ν∗,SOL increases, SOL broadens, Er shear decreases, triggers L-mode; ne drops, ν∗,SOL decreases, SOL becomes narrower, and Er shear increases, triggering H-mode, resulting in a cycle of H–L–H- oscillations. For burning plasma devices, such as ITER, operating just below the MHD limit for the dithering phase could be a promising regime for maximising core density, and fusion performance while minimising plasma-material interaction. The oscillatory signal during the dithering phase could be used as a precursor of undesirable plasma performance for control purposes.
536 _ _ |a 134 - Plasma-Wand-Wechselwirkung (POF4-134)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-134
|c POF4-134
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Goldston, R. J.
|0 0000-0002-0368-5514
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Huber, A.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)130040
|b 2
|e Corresponding author
700 1 _ |a Xu, X. Q.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)176178
|b 3
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Flanagan, J.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a McDonald, D. C.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a de la Luna, E.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Maslov, M.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Harrison, J. R.
|0 0000-0003-2906-5097
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Militello, F.
|0 0000-0002-8034-4756
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Fessey, J.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 10
700 1 _ |a Cramp, S.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 11
773 _ _ |a 10.1088/1741-4326/abf056
|g Vol. 61, no. 6, p. 066009 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2037980-8
|n 6
|p 066009 -
|t Nuclear fusion
|v 61
|y 2021
|x 0029-5515
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/904076/files/87079_understanding_the_role_of_edge_plasma_on_hdl._2.pdf
|y Published on 2021-04-28. Available in OpenAccess from 2022-04-28.
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/904076/files/Sun_2021_Nucl._Fusion_61_066009.pdf
|y Restricted
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:904076
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)188884
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130040
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)176178
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Energie
|l Fusion
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-130
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-134
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Plasma-Wand-Wechselwirkung
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2021
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a Embargoed OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0530
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b NUCL FUSION : 2019
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a National-Konsortium
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0430
|2 StatID
|d 2021-01-27
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2021-01-27
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2021-01-27
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-4-20101013
|k IEK-4
|l Plasmaphysik
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-10-20170217
|k IEK-10
|l Modellierung von Energiesystemen
|x 1
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-4-20101013
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-10-20170217
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IFN-1-20101013
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-1-20170217
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-1-20170217


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21