% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Waldmann:904122,
author = {Waldmann, Moritz and Grosch, Alice and Witzler, Christian
and Lehner, Matthias and Benda, Odo and Koch, Walter and
Vogt, Klaus and Kohn, Christopher and Schröder, Wolfgang
and Göbbert, Jens Henrik and Lintermann, Andreas},
title = {{A}n effective simulation- and measurement-based workflow
for enhanced diagnostics in rhinology},
journal = {Medical $\&$ biological engineering $\&$ computing},
volume = {60},
number = {2},
issn = {0140-0118},
address = {Heidelberg},
publisher = {Springer},
reportid = {FZJ-2021-05692},
pages = {365-391},
year = {2022},
abstract = {Physics-based analyses have the potential to consolidate
and substantiate medical diagnoses in rhinology. Such
methods are frequently subject to intense investigations in
research. However, they are not used in clinical
applications, yet. One issue preventing their direct
integration is that these methods are commonly developed as
isolated solutions which do not consider the whole chain of
data processing from initial medical to higher valued data.
This manuscript presents a workflow that incorporates the
whole data processing pipeline based on a environment.
Therefore, medical image data are fully automatically
pre-processed by machine learning algorithms. The resulting
geometries employed for the simulations on high-performance
computing systems reach an accuracy of up to $99.5\%$
compared to manually segmented geometries. Additionally, the
user is enabled to upload and visualize 4-phase
rhinomanometry data. Subsequent analysis and visualization
of the simulation outcome extend the results of standardized
diagnostic methods by a physically sound interpretation.
Along with a detailed presentation of the methodologies, the
capabilities of the workflow are demonstrated by evaluating
an exemplary medical case. The pipeline output is compared
to 4-phase rhinomanometry data. The comparison underlines
the functionality of the pipeline. However, it also
illustrates the influence of mucosa swelling on the
simulation.},
cin = {JSC},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406},
pnm = {5111 - Domain-Specific Simulation $\&$ Data Life Cycle Labs
(SDLs) and Research Groups (POF4-511) / 5112 - Cross-Domain
Algorithms, Tools, Methods Labs (ATMLs) and Research Groups
(POF4-511) / Analysis of Respiratory and Cerebrospinal Flows
by a Coupled Lattice-Boltzmann Method and Machine Learning
Approach $(jhpc54_20190501)$ / Rhinodiagnost
$(jhpc54_20180501)$},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5111 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5112 /
$G:(DE-Juel1)jhpc54_20190501$ /
$G:(DE-Juel1)jhpc54_20180501$},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {34950998},
UT = {WOS:000733700900001},
doi = {10.1007/s11517-021-02446-3},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/904122},
}