001     904185
005     20240712112913.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1002/open.202000150
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2191-1355
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2191-1363
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/30426
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a altmetric:102733501
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a pmid:33656808
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000624635500001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2021-05755
082 _ _ |a 540
100 1 _ |a Gertig, Christoph
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Reaction Mechanisms and Rate Constants of Auto‐Catalytic Urethane Formation and Cleavage Reactions
260 _ _ |a Weinheim
|c 2021
|b Wiley-VCH-Verl.
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1642775907_11563
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a The chemistry of urethanes plays a key role in important industrial processes. Although catalysts are often used, the study of the reactions without added catalysts provides the basis for a deeper understanding. For the non-catalytic urethane formation and cleavage reactions, the dominating reaction mechanism has long been debated. To our knowledge, the reaction kinetics have not been predicted quantitatively so far. Therefore, we report a new computational study of urethane formation and cleavage reactions. To analyze various potential reaction mechanisms and to predict the reaction rate constants quantum chemistry and transition state theory were employed. For validation, experimental data from literature and from own experiments were used. Quantitative agreement of experiments and predictions could be demonstrated. The calculations confirm earlier assumptions that urethane formation reactions proceed via mechanisms where alcohol molecules act as auto-catalysts. Our results show that it is essential to consider several transition states corresponding to different reaction orders to enable agreement with experimental observations. Urethane cleavage seems to be catalyzed by an isourethane, leading to an observed 2nd-order dependence of the reaction rate on the urethane concentration. The results of our study support a deeper understanding of the reactions as well as a better description of reaction kinetics and will therefore help in catalyst development and process optimization.
536 _ _ |a 899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899
|c POF4-899
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Erdkamp, Eric
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Ernst, Andreas
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Hemprich, Carl
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Kröger, Leif C.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Langanke, Jens
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Bardow, André
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)172023
|b 6
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Leonhard, Kai
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |a 10.1002/open.202000150
|g Vol. 10, no. 5, p. 534 - 544
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2655605-4
|n 5
|p 534 - 544
|t ChemistryOpen
|v 10
|y 2021
|x 2191-1355
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/904185/files/ChemistryOpen%20-%202021%20-%20Gertig%20-%20Reaction%20Mechanisms%20and%20Rate%20Constants%20of%20Auto%25u2010Catalytic%20Urethane%20Formation%20and%20Cleavage.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:904185
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a RWTH Aachen
|0 I:(DE-588b)36225-6
|k RWTH
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a RWTH Aachen
|0 I:(DE-588b)36225-6
|k RWTH
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a RWTH Aachen
|0 I:(DE-588b)36225-6
|k RWTH
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a RWTH Aachen
|0 I:(DE-588b)36225-6
|k RWTH
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a RWTH Aachen
|0 I:(DE-588b)36225-6
|k RWTH
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a RWTH Aachen
|0 I:(DE-588b)36225-6
|k RWTH
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a RWTH Aachen
|0 I:(DE-588b)36225-6
|k RWTH
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)172023
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)172023
910 1 _ |a ETH Zurich
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)172023
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Programmungebundene Forschung
|l ohne Programm
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-890
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-800
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v ohne Topic
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2021
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b CHEMISTRYOPEN : 2019
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNC4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320
|2 StatID
|b PubMed Central
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2021-02-03
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-10-20170217
|k IEK-10
|l Modellierung von Energiesystemen
|x 0
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-10-20170217
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-1-20170217


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21