% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Leenders:904188,
      author       = {Leenders, Ludger and Ganz, Kirstin and Bahl, Björn and
                      Hennen, Maike and Baumgärtner, Nils and Bardow, André},
      title        = {{S}cheduling coordination of multiple production and
                      utility systems in a multi-leader multi-follower
                      {S}tackelberg game},
      journal      = {Computers $\&$ chemical engineering},
      volume       = {150},
      issn         = {0098-1354},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2021-05758},
      pages        = {107321 -},
      year         = {2021},
      abstract     = {Large industrial sites commonly contain multiple production
                      and utility systems. In practice, integrated optimization is
                      often not possible because the necessary complete
                      information cannot be exchanged between the systems. Often,
                      industrial sites optimize the operation of production and
                      utility systems sequentially without any feedback, which
                      leads to suboptimal operation.In this paper, we propose a
                      method to coordinate between production and utility systems
                      in a multi-leader multi-follower Stackelberg game. The
                      proposed method does not require complete information
                      exchange. The only information exchanged in one feedback
                      loop is the energy demand and demand-dependent energy
                      cost.In two case studies, the method reduces the total
                      production cost by $7.6\%$ and $3.4\%$ compared to the
                      common sequential optimization. These cost savings
                      correspond to $84\%$ and $88\%$ of the potential cost
                      savings by an integrated optimization. In summary, the
                      proposed method reduces cost significantly, while only
                      incomplete information is exchanged between production and
                      utility systems.},
      cin          = {IEK-10},
      ddc          = {660},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-10-20170217},
      pnm          = {899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000649713200011},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.compchemeng.2021.107321},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/904188},
}