% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Haidl:904380,
author = {Haidl, Theresa Katharina and Gruen, Michael and Dizinger,
Julian and Rosen, Marlene and Doll, Carolin Martha and
Penzel, Nora and Daum, Lukas and Große Hokamp, Nils and
Klosterkötter, Joachim and Ruhrmann, Stephan and Vogeley,
Kai and Schultze-Lutter, Frauke and Kambeitz, Joseph},
title = {{I}s there a diagnosis-specific influence of childhood
trauma on later educational attainment? {A} machine learning
analysis in a large help-seeking sample},
journal = {Journal of psychiatric research},
volume = {138},
issn = {0022-3956},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {FZJ-2021-05950},
pages = {591 - 597},
year = {2021},
abstract = {AbstractBackground: Childhood adversities and trauma (CAT)
are associated with poor functional outcome.However, the
influence of the single CAT aspects on the risk of a poor
functional outcome withindifferent mental disorders has not
been investigated so far. Our aims were (i)to predict
individualfunctional outcome based on CAT (ii)to examine
whether the prediction power differs within
differentdiagnostic groups (clinical high-risk for psychosis
(CHR), psychosis, affective disorders, anxiety
disorders)(iii)to compare the specific patterns of CAT
experiences, influencing functional outcomes in
thesegroups.Method: Clinical data of 707 patients (mean
age:25.09 years (SD=5.6), $65.5\%$ male) of the Cologne
EarlyRecognition and Intervention Center were assessed with
the Trauma And Distress Scale. Functionaloutcome was
estimated by the Social and Occupational Functioning
Assessment Scale and schooleducational attainment. Using
machine learning, we generated individualized models to
predictfunctional outcome and to identify specific CAT
patterns.Results: Across the entire sample, the best
prediction for the functional outcome achieved a
balancedaccuracy (BAC) of 0.6. After splitting into the
single diagnostic groups, an improvement with best resultsin
the psychosis group (BAC=0.70) was observed. Considering
specific CAT patterns, the most predictiveitems depicted a
positive and caring environment – or the absence of these,
a positive self-image andexperiences of
bullying.Conclusions: Our results indicated that CAT was
differentially associated with functional outcome in
thevarious mental disorders. Thus, the importance of
mediating variables, that might explain theinterindividual
differences in the vulnerability to CAT, like resilience
factors, appeared to be crucial.},
cin = {INM-3},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
pnm = {5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability
(POF4-525)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:33992982},
UT = {WOS:000658540400015},
doi = {10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.04.040},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/904380},
}