000904418 001__ 904418
000904418 005__ 20220131120426.0
000904418 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117733
000904418 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1053-8119
000904418 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1095-9572
000904418 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/30232
000904418 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:98662932
000904418 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:33484852
000904418 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000629509400016
000904418 037__ $$aFZJ-2021-05988
000904418 082__ $$a610
000904418 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)172840$$aHabel, Ute$$b0$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
000904418 245__ $$aMale brain processing of the body odor of ovulating women compared to that of pregnant women
000904418 260__ $$aOrlando, Fla.$$bAcademic Press$$c2021
000904418 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000904418 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000904418 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1642096813_4885
000904418 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000904418 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000904418 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000904418 520__ $$aFemale chemical signals underlie the advertising of sexual receptivity and fertility. Whether the body odor of a pregnant woman also has a signaling function with respect to male behavior is yet to be conclusively established. This study examines how the body odors of ovulating and pregnant women differentially affect the behavior of heterosexual men.Body odor samples were collected from 5 pregnant women and 5 matched controls during ovulation. In a double-blind functional magnetic resonance imaging design, 18 heterosexual men were exposed to female body odors during ovulation (OV) and pregnancy (PRG) while being required to indicate the attractiveness of concurrently presented female portrait images. The participants were also required to indicate whether they assumed a depicted woman was pregnant.While neither OV nor PRG altered the perceived attractiveness of a presented face, the men tended to identify the women as pregnant while exposed to a PRG body odor. On the neural level, OV activated a network of the frontotemporal and limbic regions, while PRG activated the superior medial frontal gyrus.The results suggest that the detection of sexual availability activates the male brain regions associated with face processing and reward/motivation, whereas sensing pregnancy activates a region responsible for empathy and prosocial behavior. Thus, the female body odor during pregnancy likely helps foster circumstances conducive to the future care of offspring while the body odor advertising sexual availability promotes mating behavior. The brains of heterosexual men may be capable of unconsciously discriminating between these two types of olfactory stimuli.
000904418 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252$$a5252 - Brain Dysfunction and Plasticity (POF4-525)$$cPOF4-525$$fPOF IV$$x0
000904418 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
000904418 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aRegenbogen, Christina$$b1
000904418 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKammann, Catharina$$b2
000904418 7001_ $$00000-0001-5631-5667$$aStickel, Susanne$$b3
000904418 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aChechko, Natalia$$b4
000904418 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1471418-8$$a10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117733$$gVol. 229, p. 117733 -$$p117733 -$$tNeuroImage$$v229$$x1053-8119$$y2021
000904418 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/904418/files/1-s2.0-S1053811921000100-main.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000904418 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:904418$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000904418 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)172840$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000904418 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lNatural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing$$vDecoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction$$x0
000904418 9141_ $$y2021
000904418 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2021-01-29
000904418 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2021-01-29
000904418 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1030$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Life Sciences$$d2021-01-29
000904418 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1190$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBiological Abstracts$$d2021-01-29
000904418 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search$$d2021-01-29
000904418 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCND4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
000904418 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bNEUROIMAGE : 2019$$d2021-01-29
000904418 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2021-01-29
000904418 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2021-01-29
000904418 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2021-01-29
000904418 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0700$$2StatID$$aFees$$d2021-01-29
000904418 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2021-01-29
000904418 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000904418 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC$$d2021-01-29
000904418 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0561$$2StatID$$aArticle Processing Charges$$d2021-01-29
000904418 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9905$$2StatID$$aIF >= 5$$bNEUROIMAGE : 2019$$d2021-01-29
000904418 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews$$d2021-01-29
000904418 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2021-01-29
000904418 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz$$d2021-01-29$$wger
000904418 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2021-01-29
000904418 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-10-20170113$$kINM-10$$lJara-Institut Brain structure-function relationships$$x0
000904418 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000904418 980__ $$ajournal
000904418 980__ $$aVDB
000904418 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000904418 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-10-20170113