000904421 001__ 904421
000904421 005__ 20220131120426.0
000904421 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1007/s00702-021-02390-4
000904421 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0300-9564
000904421 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1435-1463
000904421 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/30233
000904421 0247_ $$2pmid$$a34374855
000904421 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000683640800001
000904421 037__ $$aFZJ-2021-05991
000904421 082__ $$a610
000904421 1001_ $$00000-0003-1592-5420$$aKuhn, Leandra$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000904421 245__ $$aThe association of the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism and the response to different stressors in healthy males
000904421 260__ $$aWien [u.a.]$$bSpringer$$c2021
000904421 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000904421 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000904421 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1642096903_4886
000904421 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000904421 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000904421 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000904421 520__ $$aThe experience of stress is related to individual wellbeing and vulnerability to psychopathology. Therefore, understanding the determinants of individual differences in stress reactivity is of great concern from a clinical perspective. The functional promotor polymorphism of the serotonin transporter gene (5-HTTLPR/rs25531) is such a factor, which has been linked to the acute stress response as well as the adverse effect of life stressors. In the present study, we compared the impact of two different stress induction protocols (Maastricht Acute Stress Test and ScanSTRESS) and the respective control conditions on affective ratings, salivary cortisol levels and cognitive performance. To this end, 156 healthy young males were tested and genotyped for the 5-HTTLPR/rs25531 polymorphism. While combined physiological and psychological stress in the MAST led to a greater cortisol increase compared to control conditions as well as the psychosocial ScanSTRESS, subjective stress ratings were highest in the ScanSTRESS condition. Stress induction in general affected working memory capacity but not response inhibition. Subjective stress was also influenced by 5-HTTLPR/rs25531 genotype with the high expression group showing lower stress ratings than lower expression groups. In line with previous research, we identified the low expression variant of the serotonin transporter gene as a risk factor for increased stress reactivity. While some dimensions of the human stress response may be stressor specific, cognitive outcomes such as working memory performance are influenced by stress in general. Different pathways of stress processing and possible underlying mechanisms are discussed.
000904421 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252$$a5252 - Brain Dysfunction and Plasticity (POF4-525)$$cPOF4-525$$fPOF IV$$x0
000904421 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
000904421 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aNoack, Hannes$$b1
000904421 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSkoluda, Nadine$$b2
000904421 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)172866$$aWagels, Lisa$$b3
000904421 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aRöhr, Ann-Kristin$$b4
000904421 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSchulte, Christina$$b5
000904421 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aEisenkolb, Sana$$b6
000904421 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aNieratschker, Vanessa$$b7
000904421 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDerntl, Birgit$$b8
000904421 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)172840$$aHabel, Ute$$b9$$ufzj
000904421 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1481655-6$$a10.1007/s00702-021-02390-4$$gVol. 128, no. 9, p. 1347 - 1359$$n9$$p1347 - 1359$$tJournal of neural transmission$$v128$$x0300-9564$$y2021
000904421 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/904421/files/Kuhn2021_Article_TheAssociationOfThe5-HTTLPRPol.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000904421 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:904421$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000904421 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)172840$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b9$$kFZJ
000904421 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lNatural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing$$vDecoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction$$x0
000904421 9141_ $$y2021
000904421 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2021-01-30
000904421 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2021-01-30
000904421 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews$$d2021-01-30
000904421 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1190$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBiological Abstracts$$d2021-01-30
000904421 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search$$d2021-01-30
000904421 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2021-01-30
000904421 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1030$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Life Sciences$$d2021-01-30
000904421 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)3002$$2StatID$$aDEAL Springer$$d2021-01-30$$wger
000904421 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2021-01-30
000904421 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2021-01-30
000904421 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000904421 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC$$d2021-01-30
000904421 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bJ NEURAL TRANSM : 2019$$d2021-01-30
000904421 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2021-01-30
000904421 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000904421 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz$$d2021-01-30$$wger
000904421 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2021-01-30
000904421 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-10-20170113$$kINM-10$$lJara-Institut Brain structure-function relationships$$x0
000904421 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000904421 980__ $$ajournal
000904421 980__ $$aVDB
000904421 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000904421 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-10-20170113