| Home > Publications database > Stomatal closure of tomato under drought is driven by an increase in soil–root hydraulic resistance > print |
| 001 | 904443 | ||
| 005 | 20220103172046.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.1111/pce.13939 |2 doi |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 0140-7791 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 1365-3040 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 2128/29675 |2 Handle |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a altmetric:93774546 |2 altmetric |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a pmid:33150971 |2 pmid |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a WOS:000589761200001 |2 WOS |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a FZJ-2021-06013 |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 580 |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Abdalla, Mohanned |0 0000-0002-4220-8761 |b 0 |e Corresponding author |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a Stomatal closure of tomato under drought is driven by an increase in soil–root hydraulic resistance |
| 260 | _ | _ | |a Oxford [u.a.] |c 2021 |b Wiley-Blackwell |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1640857249_6994 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a The fundamental question as to what triggers stomatal closure during soil drying remains contentious. Thus, we urgently need to improve our understanding of stomatal response to water deficits in soil and atmosphere. Here, we investigated the role of soil–plant hydraulic conductance (Ksp) on transpiration (E) and stomatal regulation. We used a root pressure chamber to measure the relation between E, leaf xylem water potential (ψleaf-x) and soil water potential (ψsoil) in tomato. Additional measurements of ψleaf-x were performed with unpressurized plants. A soil–plant hydraulic model was used to simulate E(ψleaf-x) for decreasing ψsoil. In wet soils, E(ψleaf-x) had a constant slope, while in dry soils, the slope decreased, with ψleaf-x rapidly and nonlinearly decreasing for moderate increases in E. The ψleaf-x measured in pressurized and unpressurized plants matched well, which indicates that the shoot hydraulic conductance did not decrease during soil drying and that the decrease in Ksp is caused by a decrease in soil–root conductance. The decrease of E matched well the onset of hydraulic nonlinearity. Our findings demonstrate that stomatal closure prevents the drop in ψleaf-x caused by a decrease in Ksp and elucidate a strong correlation between stomatal regulation and belowground hydraulic limitation. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact (POF4-217) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173 |c POF4-217 |f POF IV |x 0 |
| 588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Carminati, Andrea |0 P:(DE-Juel1)180847 |b 1 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Cai, Gaochao |0 P:(DE-Juel1)156154 |b 2 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Javaux, Mathieu |0 P:(DE-Juel1)129477 |b 3 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Ahmed, Mutez Ali |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 4 |
| 773 | _ | _ | |a 10.1111/pce.13939 |g Vol. 44, no. 2, p. 425 - 431 |0 PERI:(DE-600)2020843-1 |n 2 |p 425 - 431 |t Plant, cell & environment |v 44 |y 2021 |x 0140-7791 |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/904443/files/Plant%20Cell%20Environment%20-%202020%20-%20Abdalla%20-%20Stomatal%20closure%20of%20tomato%20under%20drought%20is%20driven%20by%20an%20increase%20in%20soil%20root.pdf |y OpenAccess |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:904443 |p openaire |p open_access |p VDB |p driver |p dnbdelivery |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 3 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)129477 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Forschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt |l Erde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217 |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |v Für eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von Ressourcen zu Produkten |9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173 |x 0 |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2021 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |d 2021-01-30 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160 |2 StatID |b Essential Science Indicators |d 2021-01-30 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050 |2 StatID |b BIOSIS Previews |d 2021-01-30 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190 |2 StatID |b Biological Abstracts |d 2021-01-30 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600 |2 StatID |b Ebsco Academic Search |d 2021-01-30 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a JCR |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |b PLANT CELL ENVIRON : 2019 |d 2021-01-30 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a IF >= 5 |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905 |2 StatID |b PLANT CELL ENVIRON : 2019 |d 2021-01-30 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DEAL Wiley |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)3001 |2 StatID |d 2021-01-30 |w ger |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Life Sciences |d 2021-01-30 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |d 2021-01-30 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |d 2021-01-30 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a OpenAccess |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b ASC |d 2021-01-30 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences |d 2021-01-30 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |d 2021-01-30 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4 |2 HGFVOC |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Nationallizenz |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420 |2 StatID |d 2021-01-30 |w ger |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List |d 2021-01-30 |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118 |k IBG-3 |l Agrosphäre |x 0 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118 |
| 980 | 1 | _ | |a FullTexts |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|