% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Bobe:904444,
author = {Bobe, Christin and Keller, Johannes and Vijver, Ellen Van
De},
title = {{S}ensitivity and depth of investigation from {M}onte
{C}arlo ensemble statistics},
journal = {Geophysical prospecting},
volume = {69},
number = {4},
issn = {0016-8025},
address = {Oxford [u.a.]},
publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
reportid = {FZJ-2021-06014},
pages = {761 - 778},
year = {2021},
abstract = {For many geophysical measurements, such as direct current
or electromagnetic induction methods, information fades away
with depth. This has to be taken into account when
interpreting models estimated from such measurements. For
that reason, a measurement sensitivity analysis and
determining the depth of investigation are standard steps
during geophysical data processing. In deterministic
gradient-based inversion, the most used sensitivity measure,
the differential sensitivity, is readily available since
these inversions require the computation of Jacobian
matrices. In contrast, differential sensitivity may not be
readily available in Monte Carlo inversion methods, since
these methods do not necessarily include a linearization of
the forward problem. Instead, a prior ensemble is used to
simulate an ensemble of forward responses. Then, the prior
ensemble is updated according to Bayesian inference. We
propose to use the covariance between the prior ensemble and
the forward response ensemble for constructing sensitivity
measures. In Monte Carlo approaches, the estimation of this
covariance does not require additional computations of the
forward model. Normalizing this covariance by the variance
of the prior ensemble, one obtains a simplified regression
coefficient. We investigate differences between this
simplified regression coefficient and differential
sensitivity using simple forward models. For linear forward
models, the simplified regression coefficient is equal to
differential sensitivity, except for the influences of the
sampling error and of the correlation structure of the prior
distribution. In the non-linear case, the behaviour of the
simplified regression coefficient as sensitivity measure is
analysed for a simple non-linear forward model and a
frequency-domain electromagnetic forward model. Differential
sensitivity and the simplified regression coefficient are
similar for prior intervals on which the forward model
response is approximately linear. Differences between the
two sensitivity measures increase with the degree of
non-linearity in the prior range. Additionally, we
investigate the correlation between prior ensemble and
forward response ensemble as sensitivity measure.
Correlation yields a normalized version of the simplified
regression coefficient. We propose to use this correlation
and the simplified regression coefficient for determining
depth of investigation in Monte Carlo inversions.},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact
(POF4-217)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000611909000001},
doi = {10.1111/1365-2478.13068},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/904444},
}