000904498 001__ 904498
000904498 005__ 20220103172041.0
000904498 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3390/plants10112406
000904498 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/29643
000904498 0247_ $$2pmid$$a34834769
000904498 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000727252700001
000904498 037__ $$aFZJ-2021-06068
000904498 041__ $$aEnglish
000904498 082__ $$a580
000904498 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aGould, Nick$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000904498 245__ $$aA Jasmonate-Induced Defense Elicitation in Mature Leaves Reduces Carbon Export and Alters Sink Priority in Grape (Vitis vinifera Chardonnay)
000904498 260__ $$aBasel$$bMDPI$$c2021
000904498 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000904498 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000904498 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1640770987_9288
000904498 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000904498 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000904498 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000904498 520__ $$aThis work aims to understand how Vitis vinifera (Chardonnay) vines prioritise the export and distribution of recently fixed photoassimilate between root tissue, fruit, and defence, following the elicitation of a defence response. Jasmonic acid (JA) and its methyl ester, MeJA, are endogenous plant hormones, known collectively as jasmonates, that have signalling roles in plant defence and consequently are often used to prime plant defence systems. Here, we use exogenous jasmonate application to mature source leaves of Chardonnay grapevines to elucidate the prioritisation strategy of carbon allocation between plant defence and growth. Our results demonstrate that jasmonate application to Chardonnay leaves can elicit a defence response to Botrytis cinerea, but the effect was localised to the jasmonate-treated area. We found no evidence of a systemic defence response in non-treated mature leaves or young growing tissue. JA application reduced the photosynthetic rate of the treated leaf and reduced the export rate of recently fixed carbon-11 from the leaf. Following JA application, a greater proportion of available recently fixed carbon was allocated to the roots, suggesting an increase in sink strength of the roots. Relative sink strength of the berries did not change; however, an increase in berry sugar was observed seven days after JA treatment. We conclude that the data provide evidence for a “high sugar resistance” model in the mature treated leaves of the vine, since the export of carbon was reduced to ensure an elevated defence response in the treated leaf. The increase in berry sugar concentration seven days after treatment can be explained by the initial prioritisation of a greater portion of the exported carbon to storage in the roots, making it available for remobilisation to the berries once the challenge to defence had passed.
000904498 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2171$$a2171 - Biological and environmental resources for sustainable use (POF4-217)$$cPOF4-217$$fPOF IV$$x0
000904498 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
000904498 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129411$$aThorpe, Michael R.$$b1
000904498 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aTaylor, Joe T.$$b2
000904498 7001_ $$00000-0001-5754-9254$$aBoldingh, Helen L.$$b3
000904498 7001_ $$00000-0002-3075-954X$$aMcKenzie, Catherine M.$$b4
000904498 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aReglinski, Tony$$b5
000904498 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2704341-1$$a10.3390/plants10112406$$gVol. 10, no. 11, p. 2406 -$$n11$$p2406 -$$tPlants$$v10$$x2223-7747$$y2021
000904498 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/904498/files/plants-10-02406-v2.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000904498 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:904498$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000904498 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129411$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000904498 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2171$$aDE-HGF$$bForschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt$$lErde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten$$vFür eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von Ressourcen zu Produkten$$x0
000904498 9141_ $$y2021
000904498 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2021-05-04
000904498 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2021-05-04
000904498 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews$$d2021-05-04
000904498 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1190$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBiological Abstracts$$d2021-05-04
000904498 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000904498 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bPLANTS-BASEL : 2019$$d2021-05-04
000904498 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2021-05-04
000904498 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2021-05-04
000904498 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2021-05-04
000904498 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0700$$2StatID$$aFees$$d2021-05-04
000904498 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2021-05-04
000904498 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2021-05-04
000904498 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000904498 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Blind peer review$$d2021-05-04
000904498 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0561$$2StatID$$aArticle Processing Charges$$d2021-05-04
000904498 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences$$d2021-05-04
000904498 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2021-05-04
000904498 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0320$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bPubMed Central$$d2021-05-04
000904498 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2021-05-04
000904498 920__ $$lyes
000904498 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118$$kIBG-2$$lPflanzenwissenschaften$$x0
000904498 980__ $$ajournal
000904498 980__ $$aVDB
000904498 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000904498 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
000904498 9801_ $$aFullTexts