% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Weigelt:904501,
author = {Weigelt, Alexandra and Mommer, Liesje and Andraczek, Karl
and Iversen, Colleen M. and Bergmann, Joana and Bruelheide,
Helge and Fan, Ying and Freschet, Grégoire T. and
Guerrero-Ramírez, Nathaly R. and Kattge, Jens and Kuyper,
Thom W. and Laughlin, Daniel C. and Meier, Ina C. and Plas,
Fons and Poorter, Hendrik and Roumet, Catherine and Ruijven,
Jasper and Sabatini, Francesco Maria and Semchenko, Marina
and Sweeney, Christopher J. and Valverde-Barrantes, Oscar J.
and York, Larry M. and McCormack, M. Luke},
title = {{A}n integrated framework of plant form and function: the
belowground perspective},
journal = {The new phytologist},
volume = {232},
number = {1},
issn = {0028-646X},
address = {Oxford [u.a.]},
publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
reportid = {FZJ-2021-06071},
pages = {42 - 59},
year = {2021},
abstract = {Plant trait variation drives plant function, community
composition and ecosystem processes. However, our current
understanding of trait variation disproportionately relies
on aboveground observations. Here we integrate root traits
into the global framework of plant form and function. We
developed and tested an overarching conceptual framework
that integrates two recently identified root trait gradients
with a well-established aboveground plant trait framework.
We confronted our novel framework with published
relationships between above- and belowground trait analogues
and with multivariate analyses of above- and belowground
traits of 2510 species. Our traits represent the leaf and
root conservation gradients (specific leaf area, leaf and
root nitrogen concentration, and root tissue density), the
root collaboration gradient (root diameter and specific root
length) and the plant size gradient (plant height and
rooting depth). We found that an integrated, whole-plant
trait space required as much as four axes. The two main axes
represented the fast–slow ‘conservation’ gradient on
which leaf and fine-root traits were well aligned, and the
‘collaboration’ gradient in roots. The two additional
axes were separate, orthogonal plant size axes for height
and rooting depth. This perspective on the multidimensional
nature of plant trait variation better encompasses plant
function and influence on the surrounding environment.},
cin = {IBG-2},
ddc = {580},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
pnm = {2171 - Biological and environmental resources for
sustainable use (POF4-217)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2171},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:34197626},
UT = {WOS:000679482500001},
doi = {10.1111/nph.17590},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/904501},
}