% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Rapan:904691,
author = {Rapan, Lucija and Niu, Meiqi and Zhao, Ling and Funck,
Thomas and Amunts, Katrin and Zilles, Karl and
Palomero-Gallagher, Nicola},
title = {{R}eceptor architecture of macaque and human early visual
areas: not equal, but comparable},
journal = {Brain structure $\&$ function},
volume = {227},
issn = {0044-2232},
address = {Heidelberg},
publisher = {Springer},
reportid = {FZJ-2022-00040},
pages = {1247–1263},
year = {2022},
abstract = {Existing cytoarchitectonic maps of the human and macaque
posterior occipital cortex differ in the number of areas
they display, thus hampering identification of homolog
structures. We applied quantitative in vitro receptor
autoradiography to characterize the receptor architecture of
the primary visual and early extrastriate cortex in macaque
and human brains, using previously published
cytoarchitectonic criteria as starting point of our
analysis. We identified 8 receptor architectonically
distinct areas in the macaque brain (mV1d, mV1v, mV2d, mV2v,
mV3d, mV3v, mV3A, mV4v), and their respective counterpart
areas in the human brain (hV1d, hV1v, hV2d, hV2v, hV3d,
hV3v, hV3A, hV4v). Mean densities of 14 neurotransmitter
receptors were quantified in each area, and ensuing receptor
fingerprints used for multivariate analyses. The 1st
principal component segregated macaque and human early
visual areas differ. However, the 2nd principal component
showed that within each species, area-specific differences
in receptor fingerprints were associated with the
hierarchical processing level of each area. Subdivisions of
V2 and V3 were found to cluster together in both species and
were segregated from subdivisions of V1 and from V4v. Thus,
comparative studies like this provide valuable architectonic
insights into how differences in underlying microstructure
impact evolutionary changes in functional processing of the
primate brain and, at the same time, provide strong
arguments for use of macaque monkey brain as a suitable
animal model for translational studies.},
cin = {INM-1},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-1-20090406},
pnm = {5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability
(POF4-525) / HBP SGA3 - Human Brain Project Specific Grant
Agreement 3 (945539) / HIBALL - Helmholtz International
BigBrain Analytics and Learning Laboratory (HIBALL)
(InterLabs-0015) / 3D-MMA - Gradienten der Verteilung
multipler Transmitterrezeptoren in der Hirnrinde als
Grundlage verteilter kognitiver, sensorischer und
motorischer Funktionen. (01GQ1902)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251 / G:(EU-Grant)945539 /
G:(DE-HGF)InterLabs-0015 / G:(BMBF)01GQ1902},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:34931262},
UT = {WOS:000731815800001},
doi = {10.1007/s00429-021-02437-y},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/904691},
}