% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Poorter:904693,
      author       = {Poorter, Hendrik and Knopf, Oliver and Wright, Ian J. and
                      Temme, Andries A. and Hogewoning, Sander W. and Graf,
                      Alexander and Cernusak, Lucas A. and Pons, Thijs L.},
      title        = {{A} meta‐analysis of responses of {C}3 plants to
                      atmospheric {CO}2 : dose-response curves for 85 traits
                      ranging from the molecular to the whole‐plant level},
      journal      = {The new phytologist},
      volume       = {233},
      number       = {4},
      issn         = {0028-646X},
      address      = {Oxford [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Wiley-Blackwell},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2022-00042},
      pages        = {1560-1596},
      year         = {2022},
      abstract     = {Generalised dose–response curves are essential to
                      understand how plants acclimate to atmospheric CO2. We
                      carried out a meta-analysis of 630 experiments in which C3
                      plants were experimentally grown at different [CO2] under
                      relatively benign conditions, and derived dose–response
                      curves for 85 phenotypic traits. These curves were
                      characterised by form, plasticity, consistency and
                      reliability. Considered over a range of 200–1200 µmol
                      mol−1 CO2, some traits more than doubled (e.g. area-based
                      photosynthesis; intrinsic water-use efficiency), whereas
                      others more than halved (area-based transpiration). At
                      current atmospheric [CO2], $64\%$ of the total stimulation
                      in biomass over the 200–1200 µmol mol−1 range has
                      already been realised. We also mapped the trait responses of
                      plants to [CO2] against those we have quantified before for
                      light intensity. For most traits, CO2 and light responses
                      were of similar direction. However, some traits (such as
                      reproductive effort) only responded to light, others (such
                      as plant height) only to [CO2], and some traits (such as
                      area-based transpiration) responded in opposite directions.
                      This synthesis provides a comprehensive picture of plant
                      responses to [CO2] at different integration levels and
                      offers the quantitative dose–response curves that can be
                      used to improve global change simulation models.},
      cin          = {IBG-2 / IBG-3},
      ddc          = {580},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118 / I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
      pnm          = {2171 - Biological and environmental resources for
                      sustainable use (POF4-217)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2171},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:34657301},
      UT           = {WOS:000722659500001},
      doi          = {10.1111/nph.17802},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/904693},
}