% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Vickery:904835,
      author       = {Vickery, Sam and Eickhoff, Simon B and Friedrich, Patrick},
      title        = {{H}emispheric {S}pecialization of the {P}rimate {I}nferior
                      {P}arietal {L}obule},
      journal      = {Neuroscience bulletin},
      volume       = {38},
      number       = {3},
      issn         = {1673-7067},
      address      = {Beijing},
      publisher    = {Tongfang Knowledge Network Technology Co., Ltd.},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2022-00160},
      pages        = {334-336},
      year         = {2022},
      abstract     = {Hemispheric asymmetries can be seen as one of the
                      evolutionary adaptations that allowed the human brain to
                      muster more complex cognitive processes than other primates.
                      In this vein, the study published by Cheng et al. [1]
                      presents a pivotal investigation of both the regional and
                      connectional asymmetries within the inferior parietal lobule
                      (IPL) in human, chimpanzee, and macaque. By investigating 4
                      sub-divisions of the IPL across the three species, Cheng and
                      colleagues showed that the macroanatomical and connectional
                      architecture of the IPL became more asymmetric throughout
                      the primate lineage. While macaques show little to no
                      structural asymmetries, chimpanzees display a more
                      asymmetric architecture but with both leftward and rightward
                      asymmetries in various connections. In contrast, the human
                      IPL displayed the highest number of asymmetries among the
                      three species with a clear tendency towards more
                      lateralization. This evolutionary trend towards a more
                      lateralized organization of the IPL may have accompanied an
                      improved command of tool-use, stronger forelimb asymmetries,
                      and the increasing complexity of communicative behavior.},
      cin          = {INM-7},
      ddc          = {570},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
      pnm          = {5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability
                      (POF4-525)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {34964954},
      UT           = {WOS:000735830700001},
      doi          = {10.1007/s12264-021-00807-4},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/904835},
}