% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Mauler:904873,
      author       = {Mauler, Lukas and Dahrendorf, Laureen and Duffner, Fabian
                      and Winter, Martin and Leker, Jens},
      title        = {{C}ost-effective technology choice in a decarbonized and
                      diversified long-haul truck transportation sector: {A}
                      {U}.{S}. case study},
      journal      = {Journal of energy storage},
      volume       = {46},
      issn         = {2352-152X},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2022-00189},
      pages        = {103891 -},
      year         = {2022},
      abstract     = {Achieving net-zero emissions by 2050 will require
                      accelerated efforts that include decarbonizing long-haul
                      truck transportation. In this difficult-to-decarbonize,
                      low-margin industry, economic transparency on technology
                      options is vital for decision makers seeking to eliminate
                      emissions. Battery electric (BET) and hydrogen fuel cell
                      electric trucks (FCET) can represent emission-free
                      alternatives to diesel-powered trucks (DT). Previous studies
                      focus on cost competitiveness in weight-constrained
                      transportation even though logistics research shows that
                      significant shares of transportation are constrained by
                      volume, and analyze cost only for selected technologies,
                      hence impeding a differentiated market segmentation of
                      future emission-free trucks. In this study, the perspective
                      of a rational investor is taken and it is shown that, under
                      current conditions in the U.S., BETs outperform FCETs in
                      various long-haul use cases despite charging times and cargo
                      deficits, and will further increase their technological
                      competitiveness to DTs. While future energy and fueling
                      prices are decisive for BET competitiveness, the analysis
                      reveals that autonomous driving may change the picture in
                      favor of FCETs.},
      cin          = {IEK-12},
      ddc          = {333.7},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-12-20141217},
      pnm          = {1221 - Fundamentals and Materials (POF4-122)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1221},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000780228000002},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.est.2021.103891},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/904873},
}