Hauptseite > Publikationsdatenbank > Comparison of thermochemical conversion and anaerobic digestion of perennial flower-rich herbaceous wild plant species for bioenergy production > print |
001 | 904955 | ||
005 | 20220224125217.0 | ||
024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125724 |2 doi |
024 | 7 | _ | |a 0960-8524 |2 ISSN |
024 | 7 | _ | |a 1873-2976 |2 ISSN |
024 | 7 | _ | |a 2128/30290 |2 Handle |
024 | 7 | _ | |a 34391188 |2 pmid |
024 | 7 | _ | |a WOS:000696623300011 |2 WOS |
037 | _ | _ | |a FZJ-2022-00269 |
041 | _ | _ | |a English |
082 | _ | _ | |a 570 |
100 | 1 | _ | |a Von Cossel, M. |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 0 |e Corresponding author |
245 | _ | _ | |a Comparison of thermochemical conversion and anaerobic digestion of perennial flower-rich herbaceous wild plant species for bioenergy production |
260 | _ | _ | |a Amsterdam [u.a.] |c 2021 |b Elsevier Science |
336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1642424306_30509 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
520 | _ | _ | |a The combustion quality of three perennial wild plant species Tanacetum vulgare L., Centaurea nigra L. and Artemisia vulgaris L. was investigated in comparison to the energy yield obtained from anaerobic digestions of these biomasses. Combustion resulted in 1.5–2.8 times higher energy yield compared to anaerobic digestion. All wild plants showed a similar higher heating value to Miscanthus × giganteus Greef et Deuter and Panicum virgatum L. (16.0–17.0 MJ kg−1). The ash-melting behavior of all wild plants was like Sida hermaphrodita L. Rusby, since the ash did not sinter at 1200 °C. However, Artemisia vulgaris L. had highest ash content (5.2–5.7% of dry matter) with a low ash melting behavior (1000 °C) attributed to a high potassium content and calculated phase composition. Therefore, careful consideration should be given to select the wild plants to meet the requirements for their use as solid biofuels in residential and commercial applications. |
536 | _ | _ | |a 2172 - Utilization of renewable carbon and energy sources and engineering of ecosystem functions (POF4-217) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2172 |c POF4-217 |f POF IV |x 0 |
588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Lebendig, F. |0 P:(DE-Juel1)177607 |b 1 |u fzj |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Müller, Michael |0 P:(DE-Juel1)129765 |b 2 |u fzj |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Hieber, C. |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 3 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Iqbal, Y. |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 4 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Cohnen, J. |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 5 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Jablonowski, N. D. |0 P:(DE-Juel1)129475 |b 6 |u fzj |
773 | _ | _ | |a 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125724 |g Vol. 340, p. 125724 - |0 PERI:(DE-600)1501389-3 |p 125724 - |t Bioresource technology |v 340 |y 2021 |x 0960-8524 |
856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/904955/files/VonCossel_EtAl_2021_Post-Print_aka_Ante-Print_Comparison%20of%20thermochemical%20conversion%20and%20anaerobic%20digestion%20of%20perennial%20flower-rich%20herbaceous%20wild%20plant%20species%20for%20bioenergy%20production.docx |y Published on 2021-08-08. Available in OpenAccess from 2023-08-08. |
909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:904955 |p openaire |p open_access |p VDB |p driver |p dnbdelivery |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 1 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)177607 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 2 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)129765 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 6 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)129475 |
913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Forschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt |l Erde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217 |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |v Für eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von Ressourcen zu Produkten |9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2172 |x 0 |
914 | 1 | _ | |y 2021 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |d 2021-01-28 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |d 2021-01-28 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050 |2 StatID |b BIOSIS Previews |d 2021-01-28 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190 |2 StatID |b Biological Abstracts |d 2021-01-28 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600 |2 StatID |b Ebsco Academic Search |d 2021-01-28 |
915 | _ | _ | |a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCND4 |2 HGFVOC |
915 | _ | _ | |a Embargoed OpenAccess |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0530 |2 StatID |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences |d 2021-01-28 |
915 | _ | _ | |a IF >= 5 |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905 |2 StatID |b BIORESOURCE TECHNOL : 2019 |d 2021-01-28 |
915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |d 2021-01-28 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |d 2021-01-28 |
915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b ASC |d 2021-01-28 |
915 | _ | _ | |a JCR |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |b BIORESOURCE TECHNOL : 2019 |d 2021-01-28 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160 |2 StatID |b Essential Science Indicators |d 2021-01-28 |
915 | _ | _ | |a Nationallizenz |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420 |2 StatID |d 2021-01-28 |w ger |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List |d 2021-01-28 |
920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118 |k IBG-2 |l Pflanzenwissenschaften |x 0 |
980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118 |
980 | 1 | _ | |a FullTexts |
Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
---|