001     904955
005     20220224125217.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125724
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0960-8524
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1873-2976
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/30290
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a 34391188
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000696623300011
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2022-00269
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 570
100 1 _ |a Von Cossel, M.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Comparison of thermochemical conversion and anaerobic digestion of perennial flower-rich herbaceous wild plant species for bioenergy production
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|c 2021
|b Elsevier Science
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1642424306_30509
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a The combustion quality of three perennial wild plant species Tanacetum vulgare L., Centaurea nigra L. and Artemisia vulgaris L. was investigated in comparison to the energy yield obtained from anaerobic digestions of these biomasses. Combustion resulted in 1.5–2.8 times higher energy yield compared to anaerobic digestion. All wild plants showed a similar higher heating value to Miscanthus × giganteus Greef et Deuter and Panicum virgatum L. (16.0–17.0 MJ kg−1). The ash-melting behavior of all wild plants was like Sida hermaphrodita L. Rusby, since the ash did not sinter at 1200 °C. However, Artemisia vulgaris L. had highest ash content (5.2–5.7% of dry matter) with a low ash melting behavior (1000 °C) attributed to a high potassium content and calculated phase composition. Therefore, careful consideration should be given to select the wild plants to meet the requirements for their use as solid biofuels in residential and commercial applications.
536 _ _ |a 2172 - Utilization of renewable carbon and energy sources and engineering of ecosystem functions (POF4-217)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2172
|c POF4-217
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Lebendig, F.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)177607
|b 1
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Müller, Michael
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129765
|b 2
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Hieber, C.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Iqbal, Y.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Cohnen, J.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Jablonowski, N. D.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129475
|b 6
|u fzj
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125724
|g Vol. 340, p. 125724 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1501389-3
|p 125724 -
|t Bioresource technology
|v 340
|y 2021
|x 0960-8524
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/904955/files/VonCossel_EtAl_2021_Post-Print_aka_Ante-Print_Comparison%20of%20thermochemical%20conversion%20and%20anaerobic%20digestion%20of%20perennial%20flower-rich%20herbaceous%20wild%20plant%20species%20for%20bioenergy%20production.docx
|y Published on 2021-08-08. Available in OpenAccess from 2023-08-08.
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:904955
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)177607
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129765
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129475
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt
|l Erde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Für eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von Ressourcen zu Produkten
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2172
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2021
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2021-01-28
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2021-01-28
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2021-01-28
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2021-01-28
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2021-01-28
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCND4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a Embargoed OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0530
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
|d 2021-01-28
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b BIORESOURCE TECHNOL : 2019
|d 2021-01-28
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2021-01-28
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2021-01-28
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2021-01-28
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b BIORESOURCE TECHNOL : 2019
|d 2021-01-28
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2021-01-28
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2021-01-28
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2021-01-28
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
|k IBG-2
|l Pflanzenwissenschaften
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21