% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Pauli:905221,
author = {Pauli, Ruth and Kohls, Gregor and Tino, Peter and Rogers,
Jack C. and Baumann, Sarah and Ackermann, Katharina and
Bernhard, Anka and Martinelli, Anne and Jansen, Lucres and
Oldenhof, Helena and Gonzalez-Madruga, Karen and Smaragdi,
Areti and Gonzalez-Torres, Miguel Angel and
Kerexeta-Lizeaga, Iñaki and Boonmann, Cyril and Kersten,
Linda and Bigorra, Aitana and Hervas, Amaia and Stadler,
Christina and Fernandez-Rivas, Aranzazu and Popma, Arne and
Konrad, Kerstin and Herpertz-Dahlmann, Beate and Fairchild,
Graeme and Freitag, Christine M. and Rotshtein, Pia and De
Brito, Stephane A.},
title = {{M}achine learning classification of conduct disorder with
high versus low levels of callous-unemotional traits based
on facial emotion recognition abilities},
journal = {European child $\&$ adolescent psychiatry},
volume = {2021},
issn = {1018-8827},
address = {Heidelberg},
publisher = {Springer},
reportid = {FZJ-2022-00504},
pages = {},
year = {2021},
abstract = {Conduct disorder (CD) with high levels of
callous-unemotional traits (CD/HCU) has been theoretically
linked to specific difficulties with fear and sadness
recognition, in contrast to CD with low levels of
callous-unemotional traits (CD/LCU). However, experimental
evidence for this distinction is mixed, and it is unclear
whether these difficulties are a reliable marker of CD/HCU
compared to CD/LCU. In a large sample (N = 1263, 9–18
years), we combined univariate analyses and machine learning
classifiers to investigate whether CD/HCU is associated with
disproportionate difficulties with fear and sadness
recognition over other emotions, and whether such
difficulties are a reliable individual-level marker of
CD/HCU. We observed similar emotion recognition abilities in
CD/HCU and CD/LCU. The CD/HCU group underperformed relative
to typically developing (TD) youths, but difficulties were
not specific to fear or sadness. Classifiers did not
distinguish between youths with CD/HCU versus CD/LCU $(52\%$
accuracy), although youths with CD/HCU and CD/LCU were
reliably distinguished from TD youths $(64\%$ and $60\%,$
respectively). In the subset of classifiers that performed
well for youths with CD/HCU, fear and sadness were the most
relevant emotions for distinguishing them from youths with
CD/LCU and TD youths, respectively. We conclude that
non-specific emotion recognition difficulties are common in
CD/HCU, but are not reliable individual-level markers of
CD/HCU versus CD/LCU. These findings highlight that a
reduced ability to recognise facial expressions of distress
should not be assumed to be a core feature of CD/HCU.},
cin = {INM-11},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-11-20170113},
pnm = {5252 - Brain Dysfunction and Plasticity (POF4-525)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {34661765},
UT = {WOS:000708405100003},
doi = {10.1007/s00787-021-01893-5},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/905221},
}