000905315 001__ 905315
000905315 005__ 20220131120325.0
000905315 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/30377
000905315 037__ $$aFZJ-2022-00586
000905315 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)178767$$aMaleki Balajoo, Somayeh$$b0$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
000905315 1112_ $$a27th annual meeting of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping$$cVirtual$$d2021-06-21 - 2021-06-25$$wGermany
000905315 245__ $$aHippocampal Metabolic Subregions in Healthy Older andTheir Profiles in Neurodegeneration
000905315 260__ $$c2021
000905315 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)1$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aAbstract$$babstract$$mabstract$$s1642750505_7161
000905315 3367_ $$033$$2EndNote$$aConference Paper
000905315 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aINPROCEEDINGS
000905315 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aconferenceObject
000905315 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Conference Abstract
000905315 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aOTHER
000905315 520__ $$aHippocampus dysfunction is the hallmark of Alzheimer’s pathology and is frequently investigated with FDG-PET metabolism measurements. However, while metabolic changes are a key aspect of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), different hippocampus’ subregions with their specific metabolic covariance (MC) networks haven’t been identified in healthy populations. It is also unclear to what extent these are affected by AD pathophysiology. As the hippocampus portrays cytoarchitectural, connectional and functional heterogeneity, heterogenous patterns of MC could be expected, leading to hippocampal subregions being differentially affected by AD pathology.   We investigated MC as correlations in metabolism between hippocampus and brain voxels in a large cohort of healthy older participants (n=362). To identify how the pattern of brain MC changes spatially within the hippocampus, we used a data-driven approach to cluster hippocampal voxels based on their whole brain co-metabolism profile (Eickhoff, Yeo, & Genon, 2018). The stability of different parcellation levels was measured using split-half cross-validation. We then examined the whole brain co-metabolism profile of each subregion using the general linear model. To examine whether the local metabolism between the metabolically-identified subregions in healthy older is influenced by AD pathology, we also performed a two-way ANOVA in the healthy older and in a cohort of ADNI patients (n=581) with the mean glucose uptake value as a dependent variable and both the subregions and diagnostic groups as factors. The ANOVA was followed by post-hoc analyses to identify which particular group differences are statistically significant while correcting for multiple comparisons. The results were compared with results of the same analysis using the structurally-defined and widely used FreeSurfer’s subfields.A stable 5-clusters parcellation could be identified which included an Anterior-subiculum(Red), an Anterior-CA(Yellow), an Intermediate-subregion(Pink), a Posterior-subiculum(Blue) and a Posterior-CA(Green) subregions (Fig. 1-A). As illustrated in Fig. 1-C, the Anterior-subiculum(Red) subregion mainly relates to orbito-frontal and temporal regions while the Intermediate-subregion (Pink) is a transitional subregion towards the Posterior-subiculum(Blue) subregion which has a wide pattern of cortical MC. The Anterior-CA(Yellow) subregion mainly relates to the amygdala while the Posterior-CA(Green) subregion mainly relates to other subcortical structures (Fig. 1-C). For both hippocampal parcellations, the two-way ANOVA revealed both significant main and interaction effects. Nevertheless, overall, the differentiation between CA subregions as provided by FreeSurfer did not exhibit specific group differences while the anterior-vs-posterior distinction offered by our parcellation revealed specific group differences, in particular in the early stages (Table 1).  Overall, our results suggest a MC based differentiation within the hippocampus that follows the CAs vs Subiculum differentiation known from local microstructure mapping (Fig. 1B) and anatomical connectivity (Fig. 1D). The MC patterns of the identified subregions suggested three main networks relating the anterior subregions to orbitofrontal and anterior temporal regions, the Posterior-CA(Green) subregion to subcortical structures around the ventricles, and the Posterior-subiculum(Blue) subregion to an extended cortical pattern (Fig. 1C). These MC patterns converge with the patterns of structural covariance previously shown in healthy aging (Plachti et al., 2020)(Fig. 1E), as well as the different factors of brain atrophy reported in AD (Zhang et al., 2016)(Fig. 1F) reinforcing the relevance of the derived differentiation in pathological aging. Finally, our parcellation allows the identification of specific diagnostic group differences in regional hippocampus metabolism.
000905315 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252$$a5252 - Brain Dysfunction and Plasticity (POF4-525)$$cPOF4-525$$fPOF IV$$x0
000905315 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251$$a5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability (POF4-525)$$cPOF4-525$$fPOF IV$$x1
000905315 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253$$a5253 - Neuroimaging (POF4-525)$$cPOF4-525$$fPOF IV$$x2
000905315 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131678$$aEickhoff, Simon$$b1$$ufzj
000905315 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)171719$$aKharabian, Shahrzad$$b2$$ufzj
000905315 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)167223$$aPlachti, Anna$$b3$$ufzj
000905315 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)178653$$aWaite, Laura$$b4$$ufzj
000905315 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131684$$aHoffstaedter, Felix$$b5$$ufzj
000905315 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131701$$aPalomero-Gallagher, Nicola$$b6$$ufzj
000905315 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)161225$$aGENON, Sarah$$b7$$ufzj
000905315 8564_ $$uhttps://www.humanbrainmapping.org/files/ohbm2021_abstracts_v2.pdf
000905315 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/905315/files/OHBM2021_abstract_SMalekiBalajoo.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000905315 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:905315$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000905315 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)178767$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000905315 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131678$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000905315 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)171719$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000905315 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)167223$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
000905315 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)178653$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b4$$kFZJ
000905315 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131684$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b5$$kFZJ
000905315 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131701$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b6$$kFZJ
000905315 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)161225$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b7$$kFZJ
000905315 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lNatural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing$$vDecoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction$$x0
000905315 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lNatural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing$$vDecoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction$$x1
000905315 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lNatural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing$$vDecoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction$$x2
000905315 9141_ $$y2021
000905315 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000905315 920__ $$lyes
000905315 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406$$kINM-7$$lGehirn & Verhalten$$x0
000905315 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000905315 980__ $$aabstract
000905315 980__ $$aVDB
000905315 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000905315 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406