% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Dallendrfer:905363,
      author       = {Dallendörfer, Mirko and Dieken, S. and Henseleit, M. and
                      Siekmann, F. and Venghaus, Sandra},
      title        = {{I}nvestigating citizens’ perceptions of the bioeconomy
                      in {G}ermany – {H}igh support but little understanding},
      journal      = {Sustainable production and consumption},
      volume       = {30},
      issn         = {2352-5509},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2022-00616},
      pages        = {16 - 30},
      year         = {2022},
      abstract     = {Bioeconomy is deemed to be an ambiguous term with multiple
                      facets: new products from biomass, circular and cascading
                      resource systems, developments of new and more resilient
                      plants, or synthetic biology for molecular biotechnology, to
                      name a few. Accordingly, the term is interpreted just as
                      diversely by involved stakeholders and the broader public.
                      Enabling a clear and constructive dialog on bioeconomy
                      strategies with and among society requires a profound
                      understanding of these perceptions. To address this issue, a
                      representative survey was conducted among the German
                      population in order to scrutinize the general public's
                      understanding of the term bioeconomy, citizens’ knowledge,
                      fears, and expectations, as well as factors explaining their
                      attitudes toward the bioeconomy. Our results indicate that,
                      so far, German citizens are not very familiar with the
                      concept. Its underlying ideas, however, are vastly
                      appreciated. Support for a sustainable bioeconomy is thus
                      strong and connected to high expectations in terms of
                      environmental and economic benefits, which needs to be taken
                      into account both in the implementation and communication of
                      bioeconomy strategies. Support for the bioeconomy is
                      furthermore connected to beliefs that reflect environmental
                      concern and to pro-environmental behavior. While most
                      measures and principles related to the bioeconomy (e.g., the
                      use of biogas, biofuels, renewable materials for everyday
                      products or buildings, or the cascading and circular use of
                      resources) are strongly appreciated, the use of genetic
                      engineering, for example, is opposed, mainly with regard to
                      its applications in agriculture and industry, to a lesser
                      extent in medicine.},
      cin          = {IEK-STE},
      ddc          = {333.7},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013},
      pnm          = {1112 - Societally Feasible Transformation Pathways
                      (POF4-111)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000729614400002},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.spc.2021.11.009},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/905363},
}